IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-00.txt

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Thu, 14 July 2011 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730A721F8B51 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sbcyTKNot1b for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (mxout.myoutlookonline.com [64.95.72.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A1A21F8B54 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F81C8BE670; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:15:29 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB013.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0E98BE646; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from BE235.mail.lan ([10.110.32.235]) by HUB013.mail.lan ([10.110.17.13]) with mapi; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:14:05 -0400
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:15:22 -0400
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcxCOK0hTzgE0BWSTWuJTs/SnnAgrw==
Message-ID: <58E2C94C-E470-45F2-BC2E-21C929FD221E@vidyo.com>
References: <20110607084412.16038.596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <005801cc406d$9c903090$d5b091b0$%roni@huawei.com> <9E56A50D84704E9EB96FE1EC68445967@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E56A50D84704E9EB96FE1EC68445967@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] comments on draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext-00.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:15:30 -0000

Hi, Qin --

My inclination would be that label values are used rarely enough that there doesn't need to be an IANA registry for them -- they should only be allocated by standards action, and coordination is done by the usual working group consensus processes.

Is there some use case where these values would need to be allocated for non-standards-track purposes, or by working groups other than AVTCore?

On Jul 14, 2011, at 4:15 AM, Qin Wu wrote:

> One more comment to draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-encrypted-header-ext:
> This draft allocates two new lable value from 0x06 to 0x07 for k_he and k_hs, I am wondering
> Is there a need in the IANA section to regiserter these values and if yes, who are responsible for regisering
> thes new values? Does it rely on key management protocol or SRTP protcol or this draft?

--
Jonathan Lennox
jonathan@vidyo.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email