Re: [AVTCORE] Do we need a session in IETF105?
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Tue, 04 June 2019 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3D412009E for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGUSe4cy36p7 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E4FC12004A for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [82.152.40.192] (port=57884 helo=[192.168.1.139]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1hYCmR-0005Qf-W2; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 17:59:28 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <AF2B40C5-68E2-4FC6-9C17-2B5DDA58C900@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D28EF19-9B52-4C8A-8168-E6E38D09639E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 17:59:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBBAF0A6A00@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Cc: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
To: Rachel Huang <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
References: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBBAF0A6A00@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 24
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/dc4sVOC_hTpLbyibTzVzogUitS0>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Do we need a session in IETF105?
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 16:59:32 -0000
Rachel, > On 4 Jun 2019, at 07:18, Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.huang@huawei.com> wrote: > > Please let us know if you would need a AVTcore presentation in IETF105. If there is no presentation requests, we will not request a WG session in IETF105. I expect to update draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message before the meeting, and my hope is that it will be ready for WG last call at that time. I can review the changes if you think it useful to do so, or we can do it on the mailing list otherwise. Colin -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/
- [AVTCORE] Do we need a session in IETF105? Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [AVTCORE] Do we need a session in IETF105? Colin Perkins
- Re: [AVTCORE] Do we need a session in IETF105? Huangyihong (Rachel)