RE: [AVT] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-05.txt

"Anders Klemets" <Anders.Klemets@microsoft.com> Sat, 07 January 2006 23:06 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EvN8U-0007q3-MP; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:06:10 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EvN8S-0007n2-QE for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:06:08 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA10826 for <avt@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:04:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.microsoft.com ([131.107.3.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvNEc-0001B6-V9 for avt@ietf.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:12:32 -0500
Received: from mailout2.microsoft.com ([157.54.1.120]) by mail2.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:05:54 -0800
Received: from red-hub-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.100]) by mailout2.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:05:54 -0800
Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.69.169]) by red-hub-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:05:53 -0800
Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.89]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:05:53 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [AVT] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-05.txt
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 15:06:00 -0800
Message-ID: <9ED672B9D1A64C489291BE0FB822217D0DD1C635@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [AVT] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vc1-05.txt
thread-index: AcYTb4yNjAWQHARYQ+ecjfN6hgXHmAAblh4Q
From: Anders Klemets <Anders.Klemets@microsoft.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, avt@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2006 23:05:53.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8CB1A90:01C613DE]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: miska.hannuksela@nokia.com
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org

> Surely the simplest fix here is to remove the text "(or the number of

> layers subscribed for a layered multicast session)" which is clearly  
> just a historical artefact? (and probably shouldn't have been in RFC  
> 4175 either...)

OK. Based on the discussion that we have had so far, I will remove that
sentence.  Miska mentioned that just removing the sentence is an
acceptable way to address his concern.  (It is listed as option #1 in
his January 5 e-mail to the AVT list.)

Anders


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt