Re: [AVTCORE] Next step for draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-17

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Agree, putting it as informational looks good to me.

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin Perkins" <[e-mail]>
To: "Magnus Westerlund" <[e-mail]>
Cc: "IETF AVTCore WG" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 4:48 AM
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Next step for draft-ietf-avtcore-monarch-17


Magnus,

The changes resulting from the IESG review seem to be pushing this draft away from BCP recommendations, and more towards informational guidelines. I could see the -14 draft as a BCP, but not so much the -16 draft. Given the way the draft has developed, I'd leave it as informational.

Cheers,
Colin



On 2 Jul 2012, at 10:04, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
> 
> I am personally happy with the latest changes in this document.
> 
> Glen suggested that this document should change status to BCP. That would clearly raise the documents status from "this is our thinking of how it should work" to "this is how you shall do it".
> 
> If that is what the WG think we should do, then I am happy to execute on that. People who think it should be a BCP please provide input in the next week, i.e. no later than the 9th of July.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone  [phone]
> Färögatan 6                | Mobile [phone]
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: [e-mail]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt



-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/



_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt