Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04

Linus Walleij <triad@df.lth.se> Tue, 18 January 2005 14:32 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA26402 for <avt-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:32:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CqueL-0000yu-Tf for avt-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:48:07 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CquJW-0008FK-9E; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:26:34 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CquDq-0006nh-Gx for avt@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:20:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA25483 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:20:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from igloo.df.lth.se ([194.47.250.47] helo=df.lth.se) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CquT6-0000fo-EF for avt@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:36:29 -0500
Received: from igloo.df.lth.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by df.lth.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0IEKXY5010103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:20:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (triad@localhost) by igloo.df.lth.se (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j0IEKR1j010096; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:20:33 +0100 (CET)
X-Authentication-Warning: igloo.df.lth.se: triad owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:20:27 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <triad@df.lth.se>
To: Phil Kerr <phil@plus24.com>
Subject: Re: [AVT] draft-kerr-avt-vorbis-rtp-04
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0501180846290.26244@igloo.df.lth.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0501181518290.7770@igloo.df.lth.se>
References: <41EB9C99.2080508@plus24.com> <41EBAE6C.5020603@ericsson.com> <41EBB54A.6020601@plus24.com> <Pine.GSO.4.60.0501180846290.26244@igloo.df.lth.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, AVT List <avt@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: avt-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Linus Walleij wrote:

> I don't know if there is an RFC for 
> CRC32 that you could simply reference (after checking that it conforms to 
> your implementation of course).

Now I know that there is RFC 3385 which carries an example implementation 
in Verilog, sort of awkward unless you're devising hardware 
implementations.

I'd say that SHA-1 is better for any modern software implementation, but 
it's partly a matter of taste and opinion IMHO.

Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt