[AVT] RE: draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-02.txt as a work item

"Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il> Mon, 23 April 2007 23:05 UTC

Return-path: <avt-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg7b4-00081s-0s; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:26 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg7b2-00081k-H8 for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:24 -0400
Received: from fw.polycom.co.il ([212.179.41.2] helo=isrexch01.israel.polycom.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg7b1-00021U-5x for avt@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:05:24 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:05:53 +0300
Message-ID: <144ED8561CE90C41A3E5908EDECE315C047C25F7@IsrExch01.israel.polycom.com>
In-Reply-To: <A254526E-F7D5-49BF-AE4C-D221025866CD@csperkins.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-02.txt as a work item
Thread-Index: AceF7qS9CSYqP75KRYaCWI4bxpwi1QADP4Rg
From: "Even, Roni" <roni.even@polycom.co.il>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, IETF AVT WG <avt@ietf.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortel.com>
Subject: [AVT] RE: draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-02.txt as a work item
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: avt-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,
I have no objection for adopting it as a work item but I would like to
get clarification if the intention is for payload specification for an
NTT codec or for the G.711 wideband extension work currently at the ITU
SG16 Question 10

Thanks
Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:26 AM
> To: IETF AVT WG
> Cc: Tom-PT Taylor; Even, Roni
> Subject: draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-02.txt as a work item
> 
> Folks,
> 
> We are considering adopting the RTP Payload Format for UEMCLIP Speech
> Codec
> (draft-hiwasaki-avt-rtp-uemclip-02.txt) as an AVT working group
> draft. This fits within the AVT charter, which allows us to work on
> RTP payload formats.
> 
> If there are objections to accepting this draft, please comment to
> the list before 7 May 2007.
> 
> --
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 


_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt