Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-ekt-01
Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 26 November 2013 05:58 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A8D1AE175 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:58:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97tPs0tElP2U for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1E1AE159 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:58:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1385445523; x=1386655123; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2kMUInIcCVqYqqLA3Z8YarDjklLsjekPm9TVFvt+HoQ=; b=SvE8Jo+qxGzYhCyigEnI78XhwfJVM1o1mGST9R5uaFak7cNXIwqBFUDq NVjPmzsiCyUgFB3qDXrxjgFjAwrLSRL3dDU/CBgThLODdgDNUo6b1nST0 1108tQHOpsFUC8Rad7VWdAqxf5NkgQ2Rvp7cs4r0stcbxuDIpJzYRdSMd 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAAM4lFKrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4vHaBKBZ0giUBAQEDAQEBAQkRXAUJAgsYJwcbDB8RBhOHewUOvnMTBASOPzMHgyCBEwOJQo5ShkSLTYNJGw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,772,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="98790168"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2013 05:58:40 +0000
Received: from [10.21.73.209] ([10.21.73.209]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAQ5wdba015188; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:58:39 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CEA93521.9BBF%mpeck@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 21:58:38 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C53CCA36-0FCD-4925-92C2-DF86A237438F@cisco.com>
References: <CEA93521.9BBF%mpeck@mitre.org>
To: "Peck, Michael A" <mpeck@mitre.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-ekt@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-ekt@tools.ietf.org>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-ekt-01
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:58:44 -0000
Thanks for your comments, Michael. I incorporated all those changes for -02. -d On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:09 AM, "Peck, Michael A" <mpeck@mitre.org> wrote: > Hi - I have a few minor comments: > > There are several references to AES_128 throughout the document (I counted > 6) including a statement that "AES_128 is the default value for the EKT > cipher." It looks like these are leftovers from a previous draft and > should be removed, as AES_128 is no longer a defined EKT cipher. Section > 3.4.1 states that AESKW_128 is now the default cipher. > > Section 2.1: > The ROC and ISN paragraphs both state "It is included in the EKT > plaintext, but does not appear on the wire." > The phrase "but does not appear on the wire" seems confusing to me - I'd > suggest removing it? > The EKT_Plaintext paragraph already states that the EKT plaintext doesn't > appear on the wire. > Besides, they sort-of do appear on the wire, but they're in ciphertext > form? > > Section 2.2: > "for use in processing inbound SRTCP traffic" > Should this be "for use in processing inbound SRTCP and SRTP traffic"? > > Section 2.2.2 > typo: "containing and EKT" should be "containing an EKT" > typo: "Steps 2, 3, 4 5" should be "Steps 2, 3, 4, 5" > > Section 3.4.1: > typo: "with in" should be "within" > Same sentence: should "SRTCP packets" be "SRTCP and SRTP packets"? > > Section 3.4.2: > Should "SRTCP packets" be "SRTCP and SRTP packets"? > > Section 3.5: > typo: "Section (newline) Section 3.4" should just be "Section 3.4" > > Mike Peck > > On 10/25/13 5:55 AM, "Magnus Westerlund" <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> > wrote: > >> WG, >> >> This starts a 3-week (due to the IETF meeting) WG last call of Encrypted >> Key Transport for Secure RTP with intended status Proposed Standard. >> Please provide any feedback by the 15th of November. >> >> The draft >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-ekt/ >> >> Cheers >> >> Magnus Westerlund >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 >> Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance >> avt@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt >
- [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore-srt… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore… Peck, Michael A
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore… Dan Wing
- Re: [AVTCORE] WG last call for draft-ietf-avtcore… Dan Wing