IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Comments on draft-aboba-avtcore-quic-multiplexing

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 08 November 2017 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BBA128990 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:13:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzILM1wgkVMN for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C50F129B4C for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vA8JDIe1024849 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 13:13:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
References: <CABkgnnU4C5bPje1nFGm5Z7YD5H5OrfcXJtiu_SyOouJaKCTd0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2dvXAUFS39vk0yXR7yixZ9EifUQr8OZNcFRpqV4Ze+=w1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <37be0b2e-822b-4db3-68f2-518339e8a562@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:13:13 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dvXAUFS39vk0yXR7yixZ9EifUQr8OZNcFRpqV4Ze+=w1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/sAXrifJ-Vji00_wH49mztTh039E>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Comments on draft-aboba-avtcore-quic-multiplexing
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 19:13:23 -0000

[as individual]

On 11/8/17 12:49 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] I would agree that attempting to support "every new protocol" 
> would be
> difficult and unnecessary.  On the other hand, QUIC may not be the last
> protocol that needs to multiplex with other protocols covered by RFC 
> 7983, so
> that figuring out how this works is important.
>

It worked by pure luck. I agree with Martin: that's not a sustainable 
model. I'm kind of ambivalent about the QUIC work under discussion 
(mostly because I haven't looked at the use cases in detail), but if 
you're envisioning some kind of UDP-wide /etc/magic approach, I urge you 
to stop.

/a

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status