[AVTCORE] RTP Circuit breakers and report blocks
Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Mon, 05 November 2012 21:13 UTC
Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C288821F85FC for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psq+TCjggHm6 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (mxout.myoutlookonline.com [64.95.72.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3E321F8510 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:13:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB43B7DF1EB for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:48:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan
Received: from HUB023.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mxout.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438D87DF1D5 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:48:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from BE235.mail.lan ([10.110.32.235]) by HUB023.mail.lan ([10.110.17.23]) with mapi; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:13:37 -0500
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:13:44 -0500
Thread-Topic: RTP Circuit breakers and report blocks
Thread-Index: Ac27mmvTK6HuDbVPSVO3S/PIZUGQvA==
Message-ID: <ABCE5A9E-6054-4D98-9221-41D78FCCBE11@vidyo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [AVTCORE] RTP Circuit breakers and report blocks
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:13:48 -0000
Hi -- Colin asked me to repeat on the list a comment I made at the Mic in the session today, so the idea doesn't get lost. There was the discussion about when the circuit breakers should trigger for AVPF early feedback, and the comment was it should be done for compound packets containing SR or RR packets, but not for those that don't. If something like the RGRP proposal is adopted, and in the presence of RFC 3550 report block round-robining, this will need to be more complex. I think the correct formulation might be that you should respond to SR or RR packets that contain a report block for one of your sources, but not those that don't. -- Jonathan Lennox jonathan@vidyo.com
- [AVTCORE] RTP Circuit breakers and report blocks Jonathan Lennox