[AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC5764 (4873)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 08 November 2023 08:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F95C1C02B5; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:37:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Yp3C_TGC681; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF489C1CAB31; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 8BF0BAE80; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 00:37:24 -0800 (PST)
To: peter@lekensteyn.nl, mcgrew@cisco.com, ekr@rtfm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: superuser@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231108083724.8BF0BAE80@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:37:24 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/w4SgsmDmeMLOMVAgw0Wtl2VrqBI>
Subject: [AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC5764 (4873)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 08:37:28 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5764, "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4873 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> Date Reported: 2016-11-30 Verified by: Murray Kucherawy (IESG) Section: 5.1.1 Original Text ------------- When the mechanism described in this document is in effect, this is modified so that data written by upper-level protocol clients of DTLS is assumed to be RTP/RTP and is encrypted using SRTP rather than the standard TLS record encoding. Corrected Text -------------- When the mechanism described in this document is in effect, this is modified so that data written by upper-level protocol clients of DTLS is assumed to be RTP/RTCP and is encrypted using SRTP rather than the standard TLS record encoding. Notes ----- Section 5.1 notes that RTP or RTCP can be sent over the channel, so "RTP/RTP" should be "RTP/RTCP". -------------------------------------- RFC5764 (draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Publication Date : May 2010 Author(s) : D. McGrew, E. Rescorla Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Audio/Video Transport Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC5764 (4873) RFC Errata System