Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-idms-05

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 28 June 2012 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C727D21F85C3 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFV7WsBYHSLe for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 03:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9040921F8996 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHO10415; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 05:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:58:10 -0700
Received: from SZXEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:58:06 -0700
Received: from w53375 (10.138.41.149) by szxeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:58:00 +0800
Message-ID: <E65CAE5273634FA88A5B61380CD315FB@china.huawei.com>
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>, avt@ietf.org
References: <4fde00ba.8854b40a.5854.12a4@mx.google.com><4FE3271F.7020506@ericsson.com><111C724E6D4143EA8F5D87DAD4BD6918@china.huawei.com> <1340853119.5506.53.camel@gwz-laptop>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:57:59 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02B9_01CD5557.8DD562A0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-Originating-IP: [10.138.41.149]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-idms-05
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:08:39 -0000

I see.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Glen Zorn 
  To: avt@ietf.org 
  Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:11 AM
  Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-idms-05


  On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 11:03 +0800, Qin Wu wrote: 
Hi,
I have reviewed XR Block aspect and it seems IANA has already allocated Block Type 12 to this IDMS XR Block. 
http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtcp-xr-block-types/rtcp-xr-block-types.xml
I have not been aware of this before. I am wondering what's the procedure for other SDOs to ask IETF for IANA registry?
Send Liaison statement or something else?

  AFAIK, there is no special procedure; just follow the allocation policy.

  ... 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
  avt@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt