IETF Logo Mail Archive

[AVTCORE] RFC5285bis open issues

Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> Sun, 19 February 2017 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0394812951F for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:06:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uA78ROZZKgzB for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501311296BF for <avt@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DAW58943; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:06:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.211) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:06:50 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.117]) by DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.211]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:06:47 +0800
From: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC5285bis open issues
Thread-Index: AdKKwXPucrb9jW2aSFCqJMwiTJKcvw==
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD77527B@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.201.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD77527BDGGEMM506MBXchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.58A9B48C.0102, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.3.117, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 457ba6f577104296b9867f4956859899
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/yog3sI2xiwBhAcKT1MztaN2wc3I>
Subject: [AVTCORE] RFC5285bis open issues
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:06:57 -0000

Hi,
Based on the email discussion I see some issues that need conclusion


1.       For the one-byte RTP header extension if id=0 and len>0 what action to take since there is no current text

a.       This is also padding

b.      This is an error so stop interpreting following header extensions - similar to id=15

2.       Can we conclude from RFC5285 that if only IDs between 1-14 are offered it means that only one-byte RTP header extension are supported?


Thanks
Roni Even
As editor of RFC5285bis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email