IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] My understanding of the current consensus

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Tue, 18 July 2017 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE7D131686 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4EAUxzBdSBM for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB36A13167D for <babel@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1500390569; bh=xt4Y2H3zIbVOm7n3M3Q2S6TLHxqgUson9dNo8e8uGv8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dybj1ydgCh8lsGOGYMIMUy9GmArJ82NQKMUj5idUCEwvETHrkshHirdkV+olulLHp 7eFvOBj/xWsblE26kVkQVjn5g3yphapUWvuK5Wme/L8LTPhgTnNYK9VqYzfTqCnH+L MVV+1EtkiI0+p2UIlDP4hevg6ti9cuz1QH+i0rA7+5Os2OUZvwoApFBHNP236F+/EG fSkk/Cm79g/8Y8q4x5623+0qkhvZqqt7u1wUJtcmPB58FSKt2nfJrxqZsfAkrt8Lq5 tAlZZDqQ4+IL6hym3+y5o9JiZCcjwQ5nbIZvB/WVAMy0WLHXacxEFJURtgz4OwyFTn iVnX8SJcF+QJA==
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87iniqa7dl.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <87iniqa7dl.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:09:26 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87eftdok7t.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/29bRr83k6vdKYPcYUv5VmMg8VBg>
Subject: Re: [babel] My understanding of the current consensus
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:09:34 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> writes:

> This mail is meant to reflect WG consensus.  Please yell if you disagree
> about anything.

This corresponds pretty well to my understanding :)

-Toke

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status