IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] No experimental range in the AE registry

Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> Thu, 12 March 2020 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fingon@kapsi.fi>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FFE3A1014 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kapsi.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGq-iuZKoTJu for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [IPv6:2001:67c:1be8::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C043A10A8 for <babel@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kapsi.fi; s=20161220; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fVXEEdRHMDs78b3rJtMx3f3D4jFMPBALwGaPaZzjoKw=; b=YlRaCUTI5cHBsxD32U+bGZbHB0 ePuldeMnpJIMp2FWI7AHj6DozVpkx50OvocpA8gwVtDmf/o0smD6vdBOeagfo2o00BlOJ4Id9y9+k RoNFp3wzDSr1v7/PA5KseCTAWDxUoqdNJLTbTeHTKv93cygaR4Dw1zNv0dl29/wjSBOwSmbE+B42R Hsgw0eFBSmxApgD7KknDeySSRe3KtQaPEZCBvE2TuZBj/qynxB7ilL4u5QIyVR7MU9FSfx5RvJuCZ xvLWiikZe8SileNU89UyNCsjSXB936VCGi24yrwgPL/Vnuo4QI0cV/9i8LUXJSPNaucLKXq2TQaQi GhVGHYvA==;
Received: from dgs33pyhp5lp24lvxgwgy-3.rev.dnainternet.fi ([2001:14ba:2bef:7600:ccca:596c:2633:2c8a]) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>) id 1jCT6S-0006mE-V0; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:02:45 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <8736adzf78.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 21:02:44 +0200
Cc: babel@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, theophile.bastian@ens.fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <910042DE-5141-487D-9A04-6701E4F36296@iki.fi>
References: <8736adzf78.wl-jch@irif.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:14ba:2bef:7600:ccca:596c:2633:2c8a
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: markus.stenberg@iki.fi
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/8FYwX1or4eMeCRCKaEUlNsa4VdE>
Subject: Re: [babel] No experimental range in the AE registry
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 19:02:57 -0000

On 12 Mar 2020, at 18.54, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> Théo (in copy of this mail) and myself are currently working on an
> exciting new extension to the protocol, which Théo will describe in
> another mail.  We have just realised that we have a problem: there's no
> experimental range in the AE registry.
> 
> I therefore propose to reserve the AE range 224-254 for experimental use
> in the next revision of rfc6126bis.  Any objections?  Donald, is that okay
> at this stage?

Sounds like a good idea to me; in general private use / experimental ranges should be in pretty much any protocol to decrease likelihood of prototyping conflicting later on with IANA assignments.

-Markus

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email