Re: [babel] Some open HMAC issues

David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com> Mon, 02 July 2018 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi@apple.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F191130DC3 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xRnjCli7c3SA for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA58130DCA for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1530553317; x=2394466917; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JIcPUm8VxjjYvEUZhZ9RKPFCLsWF5MqPk9XqXQ6Ikeo=; b=GPu1YhpeLMVgDnoMI5lRzYsWtCRtE1w+r5c7Vjff7avmy0pJAWrg3JIUsRHW+Pg4 TBZ2EpMYHLpxvFeL2iz9Pp6qrdLeu6N0kv0n0TLqVNYOyW6Vp20o+iKqS0LBZ30e mrhxs6f2sTQPnChyBRywzjFkvmErfOySmyBWx0naF/Snl0DxJo/db0WsmQQOv5UN cKZCsXfFjTKEipjSznOkx/1KwpIQWk+gI6noT81eGs71FkYY4aexZo33gck14smn hvqCxwikYOIb0yySSwrUZxPjZXu7POD1BHzebotxccrGtwt+Cq1bb4Lt9eQngShA yONq2e3k/2bobbbpowxAAw==;
Received: from relay2.asia.apple.com (relay2.asia.apple.com [17.82.200.16]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 2F.88.09260.4E36A3B5; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-615ff7000000242c-8a-5b3a63e2d7e0
Received: from sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com ( [17.84.80.27]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay2.asia.apple.com (Apple Singapore relay) with SMTP id 7B.15.30791.2E36A3B5; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 01:41:54 +0800 (MYT)
Received: from [17.192.155.180] by sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.3.20180614 64bit (built Jun 14 2018)) with ESMTPSA id <0PB900HAK2HRM460@sng-mmpp-sz02.asia.apple.com>; Tue, 03 Jul 2018 01:41:54 +0800 (SGT)
Sender: dschinazi@apple.com
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
Message-id: <0567A2E4-60F1-414E-BEC5-CB439AA07C22@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_06145895-4E7E-4C76-A976-C20104640CFA"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:41:50 -0700
In-reply-to: <87a7r9imhy.fsf@toke.dk>
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, Weronika Kołodziejak <weronika.kolodziejak@gmail.com>, Clara Dô <clarado_perso@yahoo.fr>, babel@ietf.org
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
References: <87sh545st3.wl-jch@irif.fr> <411E2C9F-A910-4899-8DD7-92C0C85EBC54@apple.com> <87sh523xy8.wl-jch@irif.fr> <7E5E0D4C-0049-47D1-ACFA-31EA0F843237@apple.com> <87d0w5ingo.fsf@toke.dk> <375EE128-E5F3-487C-9A9E-89A8C976489F@apple.com> <87a7r9imhy.fsf@toke.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGHRCQPdpslW0waU9/BZbFnWzWGy4vI7Z Yn7rMjaLre9XsFt8+HSH1YHVY+esu+weS5b8ZPJYvOUto8eWQxfZPF5Nf8gewBrFZZOSmpNZ llqkb5fAlfF8ywymgtkaFT+ebWVqYOxT7mLk5JAQMJH4M3UCaxcjF4eQwBYmia+nfzDCJA53 PmQFsYUEljFJPD5kAlHUwCTx7vM5sISwgLRE14W7QDYHB5uAlsSBNUYgYV4BG4lHfZfZQWxm gSSJXb/bGSHixhLrNy8EKxcGKr+wwgokzCKgKrH50H2wEk4gu+/PDyaQVcwCmxkl/kxvZgZJ iAjYSzR+vcACcUMfk8S3eV3MEIcqSvSvOcQGkpAQOMImcXBPN8sERqFZSJbPQrIcIq4tsWzh a2YIW1Nif/dyFkxxDYnObxNZFzCyrWIUyk3MzNHNzDPVSywoyEnVS87P3cQIiqTpdsI7GE+v sjrEKMDBqMTDe0HRKlqINbGsuDL3EKM0B4uSOK9Zkmm0kEB6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYm Dk6pBsbkbo07q3zecG5P8qqfxbUx+LPMCY/iF/eq/oiIBYTtE9/2/J5wH8PN51YRTC4y5163 Jws6R1h91Arj/HKWMe8aj7AnS2npLxmOKlGnsE0Xw+yvnWAXCrSpW6oYmJH+Zf8HwXlvZK1N 7ismsx8/XKcTf8dm3nfWBZe3t75Je6N0dZ2I4d36R0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAFu3cX+FAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiGBIgrfso2Sra4NIjaYsti7pZLDZcXsds Mb91GZvF1vcr2C0+fLrD6sDqsXPWXXaPJUt+Mnks3vKW0WPLoYtsHq+mP2QPYI3isklJzcks Sy3St0vgyni+ZQZTwWyNih/PtjI1MPYpdzFyckgImEgc7nzICmILCSxjknh8yKSLkQvIbmCS ePf5HFhCWEBaouvCXSCbg4NNQEviwBojkDCvgI3Eo77L7CA2s0CSxK7f7YwQcWOJ9ZsXgpUL A5VfWGEFEmYRUJXYfOg+WAknkN335wcTyCpmgc2MEn+mNzODJEQE7CUav15ggbihj0ni27wu ZohDFSX61xxim8DIPwvJvllI9kHEtSWWLXzNDGFrSuzvXs6CKa4h0fltIusCRrZVjKJFqTmJ lUZ6icWZiXqJBQU5qXrJ+bmbGEExEHRCYAfjrEMGhxgFOBiVeHgXRFtFC7EmlhVX5h5ilOBg VhLh3aYKFOJNSaysSi3Kjy8qzUktPsQozcGiJM5rkVUbJSSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUamCU c+17mPsubX9Q79eDW3VvyC23/14yXeTDHm3tbFemNC7rmXWCagqN77m2MIp7LXHfv8r1WYny i03Pfnxr6tyvJyZ/0yfeXe1hkBtP0DudZb/u7rb5knYkTWpCU8tN5yXnbyh5yjuqFahxzRXX fqof9j4pMIg5Ytbs38s2OLbpeE2ZUSVcsESJpTgj0VCLuag4EQAGoLhWfQIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/Cn8gpOuRElWWxJYpRPutjOLSvGk>
Subject: Re: [babel] Some open HMAC issues
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 17:42:00 -0000

> On Jul 2, 2018, at 10:19, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Hmm, I'm not sure that I am convinced that it is worth the tradeoff to
> add the key ID. But assuming it is: Is there any reason why this ID
> needs to be user configured? We could just define it as a 16-bit
> truncated hash of the key itself, or something like that?

I like this idea, but we'd have to be careful to not open up offline
attacks this way.

David