IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-04

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 10 April 2019 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53A41202FB for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVG1-RaKu-a5 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3EEF1200CD for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x3AFsKZi019425; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:20 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1DC73756; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id TKHQ6Q2XTHS6; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E35573754; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87r2a9x3dd.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87y34iulxd.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <CAF4+nEEfEvg_ktoudURqvCPshrA8SzL+TMGjQm6vUOFX65q==A@mail.gmail.com> <874l76xhto.wl-jch@irif.fr> <874l76w21k.fsf@toke.dk> <871s2axfei.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87y34iulxd.fsf@toke.dk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:54:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5CAE11AC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5CAE11AC.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5CAE11AC.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/I9X-0pUUdOQutO-vxVeat0P4aKg>
Subject: Re: [babel] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-babel-source-specific-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:54:29 -0000

>> I see.  So your current behaviour can be described by
>> 
>> MUST drop the enclosing TLV and MAY drop the whole packet
>> 
>> May the MUST be a SHOULD, or must it be a MUST?

> If it's a SHOULD, what is one supposed to do instead if deciding not to
> drop?

It's not required to detect the situation -- we're in nasal daemons land.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email