IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] AEs: define a registry?

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 12 August 2019 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5D4121053 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MH293iMrrbPJ for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3AA120C4E for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id z28so44975757ljn.4 for <babel@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EM9L8KL5hSy1wMDBfAurnE2CCImdTCmLT0z7BH1ZzM0=; b=X29DJR/IhnCZTqokSrCcNj6Rue0dlZ9Ul6cr2Xzr/2IXcDWKmDBZCE1L4pnQZPSqOJ Kv/GVUnXRMyBlQ6qsQ6f1T5PgOfwiV0eNBDYI2pNapzqiG1KsHcqXd03kqumljgHMMy/ oy9TCzFP6ETKmCHZhXfQOmXxZrGOV2QsK7lVuoXs66SbGSB5qvUz1YeFZXQDU6juyDJi clSFHS/8yGaYgDtCLCUkj9MDwNGcZGXneIpG1NNb4P6scyG6mIWbc/4fcFdV6xuPDYDV 0sEGU/eKW+J6t26sxnxzqI5jV5QhpQ79p1YhOIwTLmaDFTrl5XCNuiwlSSlhbZipVyPq 8B5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EM9L8KL5hSy1wMDBfAurnE2CCImdTCmLT0z7BH1ZzM0=; b=tidhiPDZok6f7sgSHYCo1qh2PnlQzmveeM6doA6BjaBDGMc5qGZmoIUCzshinz93g4 ywCQIuw4il6QCe9DJgvzsoaYyS3FK7Rth5f9oEIPTFI7dasAx9XlQAFUV/5fxRgVpOVx L4jK4dLhXRP3KKAGGwRCIde+mTL5qUA+QjsLmWhDOdt4JBlO0Hl5Nv0dQxU74bJrtM6v qmHq9Rmcm2Vld3/R/Pwku9OOvvD3B7WXEv/LXqy/KBXERxxqATSXgr2lCftf4DwJkZ8n m11/cNjIPNaJ/CHeZkisAZ3J+k03bzI04r0K0ks/GcSKDOWG9sHRsTWHjuOz1r4gpZvW KSZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWG7g7YIX4Y3SzXkUk69Dy10ROECjUvZvuIQIwtmphvuVF8L8ZH 7GFL1SLdrKB/+pZzC6lsrMCxe/BtInyzFr1so+g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqydgOIIxvMEXW5UoMTHQrVYHnGCvyFYOJtxbeSejckZwLH55r6YqAhFCy9zoggQ2wdUBnZHkU0KiSGEUugyY4E=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96d5:: with SMTP id d21mr20012683ljj.170.1565634364453; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <871rxrdad3.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <871rxrdad3.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:25:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+4A=Sg7Myya2haijaF9VeukLoYikT9BEtGvWY7tk42PrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000243a64058fefa862"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/MZV2ebQpVa0J5-nPahIZIyx_edk>
Subject: Re: [babel] AEs: define a registry?
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:40:21 -0000

I think adding a registry is the best way forward.

David

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:34 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> I've just found an omission in the mots recent draft of 6126bis: no
> registry is defined for Address Encodings.
>
> Would anyone object if I added an AE registry to the IANA Considerations
> section of rfc6126bis?
>
> -- Juliusz
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email