IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Open issues with draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Thu, 25 July 2019 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE612013C for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEryjkNs85uJ for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87A5120025 for <babel@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x6PBYPfP024793; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:25 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BD53ABF9; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id KAZdG6_7_g12; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (82-64-141-196.subs.proxad.net [82.64.141.196]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C2C03ABF7; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:28 +0200
Message-ID: <878ssmuz3v.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: babel@ietf.org, Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste.jonglez@imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <878ssmz83p.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <87k1c75cn5.wl-jch@irif.fr> <878ssmz83p.fsf@toke.dk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:34:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5D3993C1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5D3993C1.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5D3993C1.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/RIIphmZUMgjDw_UQZX2OOIrgolY>
Subject: Re: [babel] Open issues with draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:34:32 -0000

> I haven't looked very carefully, but I think you are probably right that
> we *can* make do with this. A separate timestamp TLV seems
> architecturally cleaner to me, though, although I can't really explain
> why...

I have the same feeling.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status