IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-04

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 20 April 2018 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA08912785F; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxpBqLHE6zZG; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85556127077; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/75695) with ESMTP id w3KHZ4un031658; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:04 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4047EB21E; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 7iv7k14wwJsu; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B51BEB226; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:02 +0200
Message-ID: <87r2n9u6gp.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis.all@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <152423086508.3257.3447827631091630217@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152423086508.3257.3447827631091630217@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 20 Apr 2018 19:35:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5ADA24C8.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5ADA24C8.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5ADA24C8.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/Vo65vJlnaqVqpCRKkySZ2OQwsoo>
Subject: Re: [babel] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:35:12 -0000

Dear Mehmet,

> Reviewer: Mehmet Ersue
> Review result: Has Nits

Thanks for your review.  It will take me a few days to find the time to
produce a new revision.

> == There are 1 instance of lines with multicast IPv4 addresses in the document.
>  If these are generic example addresses, they should be changed to use the
> 233.252.0.x range defined in RFC 5771

If you are referring to Section 5, then this is the address assigned by
IANA to the protocol.  If you are referring to something else, I'd appreciate
a clarification.

Thanks,

-- Juliusz Chroboczek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email