IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] RTT consensus

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 30 July 2019 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BC3120281 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWcJxqPDEfyy for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9498B120159 for <babel@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id i10so17971284iol.13 for <babel@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVQcUqW/SRZtZn4JOe3vM4WOVlJCC+0L3Ajhm5aBX1o=; b=TRW+gkmENlQSLL7/qq7pc/3rk+rQPJkX+UzvGhu57517P1vmKqz/vqFomH6cKoWQVC LPWbHNu8q3qemKVJz+6zoR+Ja8Pi/CxwUZO2NGTukjCDXONx/juRIn2lP5+dKDCScBPb NiNmPN/cLFUh6dXyEq7Tu1v9nTHLLsDrJ52v7KRP/n9O9njGZSmYB+MbWt0MAPQalj15 j/M4u07KMnAKCKU6Rs7LjKMUb1FrUZcb24dQ8EMnPKzbl34oeRyMIpm//jNKNo4zGlex 7MiMI0SWlVZBh+EVnTLxArZLYNCfQ7VCSPEZqeGKYJI4M9rJtyB4G32csu1GpVr0Kqi6 WTgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gVQcUqW/SRZtZn4JOe3vM4WOVlJCC+0L3Ajhm5aBX1o=; b=qu0MO0bw/2aNdvBbYNf6JRnFMeQnNWaUdVDVC/a/cv8FvZuDxgBqwOigTH1sP8noXo 8fCvbaJ5ySVfalYW3S2tZ7AuHTQaY3Ju6+dCeByWjaz45oNZj1+8PqkiyvyNvcAwn4mk EwoF2ylzhsspkw29pdkm/13gk4BCAg8Ot5zZM0AGAeow0adP44lUjCI2Vqo952w94hZu AO+/ZEdMdEDa/5WUAkxzD6z++e8RtD7fdJmrmAdNzG91Cj2bzoTCt7Q5BX+hHbhY2EqE 5pkVxwX365m3BLnHrVvcOFfi9gQ3z1DHNIYmsbhEEo1uFUdeNOt42EVgXYXNs5uCjWsP bwrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNFMI9Ra1qfCbmw1f3g869LBwv7nL1YhM6O64D+4wzbu2JjLjm 4bpkccQ0m1nk1FCIR9/zDQ/fZi4OctPH6de0/V7362pK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyAz123LTINjbwGGuhMlAk24nrGk3+rmfcS4h/1w9M8ZF2132wMc3zVoW7qRsel2uPkR+vt7KQFGrfhNaSGlBs=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f80b:: with SMTP id o11mr100084249ioh.40.1564519445267; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87r26df406.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87r26df406.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:43:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHiJV1qCFLEMhRRsYPr9-08tT1DeRhE=pqfw6fbA0wwgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Cc: Baptiste Jonglez <baptiste.jonglez@imag.fr>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/YNTV3jtNjZfl7TQMjJqq2O2WSGU>
Subject: Re: [babel] RTT consensus
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:44:15 -0000

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 7:07 AM Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>
> 1. There appears to be consensus that we keep the current µs granularity.
>
> Good.

This was the consensus in the room in Montreal and I haven't seen any
opposition to it but to be sure it's confirmed on this mailing list,
I'll wait until this coming Saturday to formally declare consensus on
that point.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> 2. There is some misgivings about attaching transmit timestamps to Hello
>    packets
>
> The alternative is to define a new TLV that contains just a transmit
> timestamp and deprecate (but not obsolete -- no flag day) the current
> transmit timestamp sub-TLV (attached to a Hello).
>
> We need more thought.
>
> _______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status