IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-04

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 07 November 2018 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDA3128CF2; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 03:22:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qYkDl-kxrRvZ; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 03:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F45128A5C; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 03:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id wA7BMkAY022810; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:22:46 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AC059AB6; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:22:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id hxzPf6Rmu-3o; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lanthane.irif.fr (unknown [172.23.36.89]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76D7A59AB1; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:22:50 +0100
Message-ID: <87sh0djfn9.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>, dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEHvxTTypXnJGn0bt7+ot6xMaJSQSHO3Tp8j0UL+1Z5zwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEHvxTTypXnJGn0bt7+ot6xMaJSQSHO3Tp8j0UL+1Z5zwQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:22:46 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5BE2CB06.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5BE2CB06.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5BE2CB06.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/dyNdQPcDpk31RjJYiY33NbFWOWI>
Subject: Re: [babel] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-babel-applicability-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:22:56 -0000

(Fixed David's mail in CC.)

> OLD
> o strict monotonicity of the metric: for any metric M and link cost
> C, < C + M;
> NEW
> o strict monotonicity of the metric: for any metric M and link cost
> C, M < C + M;
> ^^

> Although this is a pretty minor change, i think the draft should be fixed
> before publication is requested.

Thanks, fixed in git.  I'll wait until tomorrow to see if I get any
feedback from the meeting, then submit new revisions of both applicability
and 6126bis.

As to HMAC, we need to write a Security Considerations section, so it
might take a few days (Weronika is busy).

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email