IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] info-model: preparing -09 on github

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 August 2019 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20110120113 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wk6dOMXMFQu for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C53120018 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f9so6347498ljc.13 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=u6EKiIz9rGJQstWIJ3gH9e8BwXmyL/U6F1EsvY5t3kI=; b=M+GaTiE7fdmF15mH7JSJ82SmuOpGUrtA6U2jawI4OJ90WTQnTyOGuF5UjLkOkgTKLv IqZGO/+u0Siqo/lvK2BlMNzsfc66rbSfPAKf5VnRWmNiHtaNdU1vuMVLZgosz+T3yqVD R892M6KqSJJna5CRmdI3m5ud6IdWur+UU7GAVvVV2rVFGO+h/z8L+oBUr15wZVWzR3iC nN2dXL/Xa78CSv9g+SwhK5GTZzYYg1ZNDEiCCu69UlJNtWhOWpfrtj3sH/ERkUit9hbc Ni36xUfY7bTGaiRm8t704oNivIblGoWqYwRqrsBXTgfGn7U2q6+ejLPWBkr0ohOOOfdB NeRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u6EKiIz9rGJQstWIJ3gH9e8BwXmyL/U6F1EsvY5t3kI=; b=scw+cAVhqFbA6vhcsioP1Lsvftw5clk8aLd2maznHCc7Ntv3C9RHgwToKYyVSGqItU XOUxM785tPeScDnR3NoVLNPnSaThb/NPd97ySM1m0bdAmf/BOw/A07BR+9mgVyweHccz 5UKyVl8EjXkTOszbVoMTIHwVQMsp/n7WUQjoijLCMkFhg08BEiPKs0NNjU0dIoJxsgoW GCdhhQOKvL7vCTjgglp3J6txrsrVBdYjGfIokbXJWfFBsAYbCFduV3loAXmKczLxchDF 6UOvJRLLMtJfDFjwpSb9pQiHpa/QbRaOLCTn3W803nRlOC3Mo3KSjZEs45uAvjtieVuv Jmdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRTxNWGw32fUWarHwkHPPnUItIiaxgCsLgptkMN4+nkzquOetX GzTmQrYpaq5bjeWYCOM7nHl0b0bKwUDt/x4jRQ0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyz6ljEGQd/y1Rnb2KAP5of9OIFPfG7NiDNZq3CGjA5Fr4omURseB5uheCpEVLaqGWYtVjcAbp8umod7h2gxPI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:81c3:: with SMTP id s3mr6573486ljg.70.1565987218542; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E2694DE@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87ftm3u0a6.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E269981@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87blwrtudx.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E275E65@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <CAPDSy+4+46nUbUF=C-U1Jvw2QDZMRZ9-vXrRVwh71y8ne6e0Mg@mail.gmail.com> <87pnl5i25g.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E279DAD@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E279DAD@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:26:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+53ZM1YBe2mRhRUqYf3V4-DuL5NY_eS9Nwi0sCCmPTTLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e25523059041cf63"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/fmUF2nAZghZiKVxpKpot6HQeiGY>
Subject: Re: [babel] info-model: preparing -09 on github
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:27:02 -0000

I'm getting a sense that I'm in the rough here. I don't feel too strongly
about this issue, and I can live with this choice even though it's not my
favorite. Thanks for letting me say my piece, and considering it as an
option.

David

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:42 PM STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> > Barbara suggested:
> >
> > > This value is of a length suitable for the associated
> > > babel-mac-key-algorithm.  If the algorithm is based on the HMAC
> > > construction, the length MUST be between 0 and the block size of the
> > > underlying hash inclusive (where "HMAC-SHA256" block size is 64 bytes
> > > as described in {{RFC4868}}).  If the algorithm is "BLAKE2s", the
> > > length MUST be between 0 and 32 bytes inclusive, as described in
> > {{RFC7693}}.
> >
> > I fully support this formulation.
>
> I'm happy to go with this. I'm putting it in my editor's copy.
> Barbara
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email