IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] info-model: hmac

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Sat, 23 February 2019 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6511289FA for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 03:50:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SR-aFiu0mB4F for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 03:50:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB43012D829 for <babel@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 03:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x1NBoKl0014183; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:20 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70DB4F41D; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id W0XGcJRXtjnt; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62C964F41B; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:22 +0100
Message-ID: <878sy6k9kx.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E0AD1BC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E0A5536@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87a7is2nri.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E0ACFAC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87wolryd4a.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E0AD1BC@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 12:50:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5C71337C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5C71337C.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5C71337C.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/jZg0sH9lV7NJUL1PiFfX3Qd500U>
Subject: Re: [babel] info-model: hmac
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:50:34 -0000

> Do you prefer option 1 (to apply to all interfaces, list all interfaces)
> or option 2 (Boolean to apply to all interfaces)?

I think it's good to be able to say that a key applies to all interfaces,
especially if the set of available interfaces can vary dynamically.
 
> Both use-sign and use-verify parameters are Booleans, and they're
> independent. So, no, there's no intent that if use-verify is false this
> implies it's still used for signing. Only if use-sign = true is it used
> for signing. It's possible for one or the other to be true, both true,
> or both false.

Right.  Looking at your prose again, nihil obstat.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email