Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-04
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Fri, 14 April 2023 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3EFC14CE3F; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vErtrusQXXZC; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54C27C14F73E; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f09b4a1537so229895e9.0; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681503541; x=1684095541; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yLsvo7Yk/MgvxkGbjrrF5FnaGef1V2UBYyRFSV7iYXE=; b=qv6qc6ba8fNseD8riH1hLbjeqle4Gt9DdBA91nNqn8xpaqiq4X2CohwpRZh6IvtWrw 4ye/bP6XnsRSwJtV8mWjGqDYX9GLiIFbaYo0OWp9aOSYSbWdT1+N5h8m23wHYlvBzKkC 2/IVhbtxMSfiiSYpnHAPqUKYHTAMb2SmSKP4RbPWc5+enuWLPwrqS6Df/Uvp/eLux1cC imPwcq3/o/v3wbE6P1IEtZFKY4OrZ8tYhy5BgmXdxXaLFeELR9nBCjnH5IHNE1U3piiJ nQAK353QlsPNSxFqg5eR35WONPswnooBDX4mdDI02FosM732SGbuLMU9WefLorbPdMfU CVpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681503541; x=1684095541; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yLsvo7Yk/MgvxkGbjrrF5FnaGef1V2UBYyRFSV7iYXE=; b=lFbGWmUuz+wEKcsW4g5HHDSznWz4OgyEXZq5FVusSu8nxeT/efGAxIAEuwNtp75D0J wqD/chSqdBIPJiIZZO5lc4oKkfg3rJjVc5Xp63MVystobaLH8mFEDQOMWeppQ0NTIFRL 0dtkU+vbZah8Hp4dESdSgcdXAFQ7Fl587361bV7LhVICl3G3t+rTaBKizNE7k5yO4WRi VnK2v0agyi/mzwm66xtK5dVcwen6LzXVJsKCOo5HdOmiSwXP7L/8xAp0XS9l7a44kXQR fic802wL9++Wh7OWnQ+kmVnCBVH+eJG0IpMcKHICbfXOaWVYZWK/xCZumxZ2SvycKu7t AAGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fNRU4jg5YgsE3OE78Fz6wirZnokqpg6I+NXJZeNaglYe70yREH TY4GjbBlmIJ3RhoiAboXQfoBzBkhRPAcYDsfsh0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ahIO8c92YwpPMwL4hJ98y1FxfIshDVIj9jQwVAHIMjG68t5B03DEQYBdG9VjCApXJ1jwjd6XS8/AvAMcxFtuE=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f40a:0:b0:2cf:e995:afef with SMTP id g10-20020adff40a000000b002cfe995afefmr13657wro.13.1681503541193; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168148347371.47309.16234400313355691909@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPDSy+5ehHyZj9LNuWirEmx8ZtM=2B4vaUk5oZWrRmMK2kL4MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJU8_nX2aH=NRYpgv517ujfxsa9pp99EetAKN6WAagBA3QQ2DA@mail.gmail.com> <871qkmdyvi.wl-jch@irif.fr>
In-Reply-To: <871qkmdyvi.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:18:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6_wzzzhZ43jqzJUT3JnbrhGq_QUY9=8QOJs89yAVp3EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, tsv-art@ietf.org, babel@ietf.org, draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/kkEEFo8rRjRK--uvLP9mDfUs2OM>
Subject: Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed-04
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 20:19:06 -0000
More broadly, it is delay in general that is a problem for all the IGPs I have tested to date. Whether it be processing time of routes (cpu bound), or network bound (slow wifi multicast), really bad things start to happen once the window for processing events is exceeded. I wrote this readme in exasperation years and years ago. https://github.com/dtaht/rtod#rtod-routing-tables-of-death The same holds true for bgp, as well. I like that babel has a hitherotofore unused facility for dynamically managing the announcement intervals, and hope one day more demons of all sorts, with implicit processing deadlines, do explicit things to shed load intelligently, rather than fail randomly. We have long had facilities in linux at least (fdtimers) to better monitor exceeding deadlines. None of what I said has any bearing on the comments you are discussing!
- [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bab… Kyle Rose via Datatracker
- Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… David Schinazi
- Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Kyle Rose
- Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Dave Taht
- Re: [babel] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf… Kyle Rose