[babel] Remaining work for rfc6126bis

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E138C126BFD for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ilE7TiRt-7J for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E1D120046 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id v4OHn0pX018055 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 19:49:00 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C270EB200 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 19:49:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id vY_kBrO1QDnC for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 19:48:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 773A6EB204 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 19:48:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 19:48:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87fufu9md0.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: babel@ietf.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Wed, 24 May 2017 19:49:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5925C78C.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5925C78C.001 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5925C78C.001 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/lyiqAQ65a4jdUwbb54O5Q3qBOeE>
Subject: [babel] Remaining work for rfc6126bis
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:49:04 -0000

Dear all,

-02 contains most of what I had planned for rfc6126bis; I, for one, would
not be overly disappointed if this version were submitted for publication
as an RFC.

I think the only remaining protocol change that we want to consider at
this stage are extensions to the Hello-ing mechanism, notably unicast and
interval-less hellos.  There are various possibilities:

  - use the Reserved field of the Hello TLV (preferred by David S.);
  - define a new TLV (preferred by Markus S.);
  - define a mandatory sub-TLV of the Hello TLV.

Other than that, I believe some purely editorial changes are still
required, I'll go through my (very messy at this stage) notes at some
point.  Plus I need to acknowledge everyone who participated without
missing anyone.

Other WG work required:

  - change the IANA registries to reflect mandatory bits (Donald, how do
    I do that?);
  - work on the applicability document (grr, it bores me to death);
  - finalise the data model.

There's some non-WG work that's required for further progress:

  - make all implementations known to Man (includes women) grok mandatory
    bits, and bully everyone to deploy the new versions;
  - document the new extensions (new format of source-specific, TOS-specific)
    and make sure they don't suck (Matthieu, Gwendoline, that's you);
  - work on Stenberg-Schinazi style security for Babel (Antonin, that's you).

-- Juliusz