IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [babel] Babel YANG Model Write-up and IETF Last Call Comment

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BC83A0E82; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgYfxSoiF1hG; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE173A0E79; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id s20so19612483plr.13; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7AtGtftn/Q4e/mvGUAjshNkQq6bfcgFm0te0980I8/o=; b=PnrXAkt/6Zyn5FsT0tjKM338oCxu3w0x2nXcF2T/UO5iGFnSieaX8xxdl/Un9pPCQS H+pwQVGy63EGiFrQxzmRliMhFhT0GBXUPT84yf3bSD68WGAO2oHIbPvhkC5XoPBJ+Nal kModnISNXJWuPdKZoN60jfd38N3iM3y+XGpCWtgT+dt/4iT/P6rAwmW+M8xAyUy0xkJp dd3UQ3ITZBKIyYjprFsFL8y7Jv1WedD3328+tfw1gEa6PF1o82YDsu6pBMrgm6RNvOF8 kEvJ5Sm9KIUP7Tg0XWUZGAY9inP02//UBMCkJLrQ+BDqXnbbCqo13LDRJcVw42LtjZps rs3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7AtGtftn/Q4e/mvGUAjshNkQq6bfcgFm0te0980I8/o=; b=VQIcNghJ6Spvhf4L1tQrwQT9UDn/fPIYGxmzGtCwgF0iVj7zCfzYP2wlqtp9h05D4Z CfB8hH+beGYKs6vHC5/i7+8d3tJ87FAqAAadMPhyXtcOzpl10+gA3NGhAKN7+ZKOY6xG vTgcXQzZMltbRz23cj/fqE2gMIOO0JVyXN80v08uNGkgkRpWz8bpEmXvwEQd1ln+flAG 2ujFDVWvi/ckZ9QAQxaT12aJgfBUnb/nPPnN2ktF1pDzpIZ6GuBPYn+rmwBbQnKMkQaf qVwMqP1sBFN8oI2kVPEjoDkEHNhhhn2f7KiQkoNvze1ujxiix8Vz6rmfMG6nb16Cxw3x auCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EQhfls7x04K6d05Ah3VWFxILF/syiZi/JGWiDZ7PxmOITb22Y YjuOQLKesads8VqUS+X+mdk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJ8RcCOt0L2NbnofrW1vwK2AVBccgWs7NV72H9QSBLeAoxxntkXf9bqkTe2BNDTzC2HAyDIQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e615:: with SMTP id j21mr11424994pjy.43.1619729990061; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:5dcf:be7e:bcf4:73b2? ([2601:647:5600:5020:5dcf:be7e:bcf4:73b2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm3078675pjy.42.2021.04.29.13.59.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <7A6404FB-1A09-4C6C-9246-5F2DAC336AED@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EC1CD9CD-DE59-4E08-8D8F-AC8CF2D7952F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:59:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGGk=NbYmqXhdKMpq+=1N+M34SL6b2+3oOF33-io21=6w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>, babel-chairs <babel-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEGGk=NbYmqXhdKMpq+=1N+M34SL6b2+3oOF33-io21=6w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/r4lb5PCfxA8ytYjcSGaBKJlsPTw>
Subject: Re: [babel] Babel YANG Model Write-up and IETF Last Call Comment
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:59:53 -0000

Hi Donald,

> On Apr 29, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I have updated the Shepherd write-up on draft-ietf-babel-yang-model. See
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-yang-model/shepherdwriteup/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-yang-model/shepherdwriteup/>
> 
> I notice there is one IETF Last Call comment on this draft (see
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/eTzywSm1Ke5vfs415w9p1wNHYzM/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/eTzywSm1Ke5vfs415w9p1wNHYzM/>)
> Is it important to post a response to that comment to the IETF Last Call mailing list?

I was planning on addressing this as part of other comments I will receive on the document as it progresses. It is a fairly minor edit.

Thanks.

> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com <mailto:d3e3e3@gmail.com>_______________________________________________
> babel mailing list
> babel@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email