Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 06 January 2017 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67016129D18 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:37:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-mo5a_q1Wfh for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E47129591 for <babel@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trurl.irif.fr (unknown [78.250.43.111]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06505B005D2; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 18:37:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:37:37 +0100
Message-ID: <878tqogkda.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hM0AeR684ouWv3Rc8kHnCOEdtDVVLjQT3V4+jQCDHwNZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.1581.1483630892.3886.babel@ietf.org> <CA+wi2hM0AeR684ouWv3Rc8kHnCOEdtDVVLjQT3V4+jQCDHwNZg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/vcqtjJ5l0zhBIaOX7zf0DkElH0A>
Cc: Babel at IETF <babel@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 17:37:49 -0000
> You don't give link-state enough kuddos for convergence speed Ok, here we go. With a link state algorithm, given enough CPU, convergence speed is almost entirely predicated on the speed of LSDB synchronisation. This gives link-state protocols a fundamental advantage as far as convergence speed is concerned, at the cost of greater complexity and lesser robustness than well-designed distance-vector protocols. -- Juliusz
- Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5 Tony Przygienda
- Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5 Tony Przygienda
- Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5 Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [babel] babel Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5 Juliusz Chroboczek