Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-02.txt

David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com> Wed, 11 April 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi@apple.com>
X-Original-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17782127444 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2P7t0yZVnv97 for <babel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-in4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.151.62.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B91E127419 for <babel@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1523463582; x=2387377182; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8CKJFucgNc6QQOEmwYdcKaHIWunsBSrDShs2H5k0gp4=; b=zAZ2M3opCyUqgsTQHD7xj49flthwkciqi9H6qbWiBRnFGcO82yP/hpcfRtVJJjSH BQuhhYWHiGKmzEURK7En7Fsc6RDvEGKaI+JAdMdTPqljKKGhSEaCmkX4TKLGSLGr njyedsEgKqgmssT79uUXkmeyUIwaBw8RXAC4H6FLxZUAmVQn9v65Y8H6loX5TSHS dUpmF/ll/Vlsw9V3XcMMOt8YMWBiLBKrvvn7DTny0rIgMH3RKvhxR6mYCuuClHRI vx8uzVHNpeuH+TkmPebSUIkHiEP08ARk62B4ayVi685GGS5H+IhhuyPMh1NFqXkW 3cQgxW0zMkPSnZRCPTIJSA==;
Received: from relay7.apple.com (relay7.apple.com [17.128.113.101]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-in4.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id B1.5D.07147.E953ECA5; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11973e12-833ff70000001beb-80-5ace359e9975
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com [17.128.115.216]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay7.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 82.2B.21982.C953ECA5; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from [17.234.117.4] by nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.2.20180403 64bit (built Apr 3 2018)) with ESMTPSA id <0P71001DM3ZVHM50@nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dschinazi@apple.com
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <87in8xc3fn.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:19:38 -0700
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "babel@ietf.org" <babel@ietf.org>
Message-id: <465529F4-55B7-439D-8022-C61864D3320C@apple.com>
References: <152296922074.3735.16897081899496814064@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DD686A8@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87y3hyam6h.fsf@toke.dk> <E56431DB-1B79-4B10-B5E2-C0D1A7C0DC2A@apple.com> <87in8xc3fn.wl-jch@irif.fr>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FCYqjvP9FyUwYz1UhZbFnWzWEz6+5PR Yn7rMjYHZo+X/XMYPZYs+cnksXjLW8YA5igum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujCeffAq6WCoutu9gbWCc x9zFyMkhIWAi8e7UOyCbi0NIYA2TRNvMG2wwibZ/b5kgEhuYJC5uv80CkuAVEJT4MfkekM3B wSwgL3HwvCxImFlAS+L7o1YWiPovjBJLu96xgySEBaQlui7cZYWwvSSevZnECtLLBtRwYI0R SJhTQEOi8/15sJEsAqoSB+5ZQoz0kji8YjM7xFYbiY0XVkHd+ZdR4tKxi2AJEQEVieXTnrFD 3KwkMf37baj7J7BJvLkYP4FReBaSq2chXD0LydULGJlXMQrlJmbm6GbmmeglFhTkpOol5+du YgQF+nQ7oR2Mp1ZZHWIU4GBU4uGNMD4XJcSaWFZcmXuIUZqDRUmc9xjziSghgfTEktTs1NSC 1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjLGx37ICrmw9e+vXKY0/enfPuvarduxm4dD/veDrErE3WtOarcyT mvfdV9QV0jD8+ysv2rTv8ZMvN7du8nj6ti9cUXjOuYVav34Xfk0NfHoqe3mU4lbXDVo2N+cz 7HT5mbApVqLW57FebYb1brXNViWzpb0mbuhMTWi8l9ki0spt/qiX8WCqpBJLcUaioRZzUXEi ADqL5X9VAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FB8Q3eO6bkog2s7DSy2LOpmsZj09yej xfzWZWwOzB4v++cweixZ8pPJY/GWt4wBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGU8++RR0sVRcbN/B2sA4 j7mLkZNDQsBEou3fW6YuRi4OIYENTBIXt99mAUnwCghK/Jh8D8jm4GAWkJc4eF4WJMwsoCXx /VErC0T9F0aJpV3v2EESwgLSEl0X7rJC2F4Sz95MYgXpZQNqOLDGCCTMKaAh0fn+PNhIFgFV iQP3LCFGekkcXrGZHWKrjcTGC6uYIcb/ZZS4dOwiWEJEQEVi+bRn7BA3K0lM/36bbQKjwCwk l85CuHQWkksXMDKvYhQoSs1JrDTXSywoyEnVS87P3cQIDs3C1B2MjcutDjEKcDAq8fBeuHUm Sog1say4MvcQowQHs5II79HfZ6OEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ885cfTRKSCA9sSQ1 OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwKjoMHmR0j+/TZcqOMMDN8wwXFV8cNu7/NmfbwRYJplrzpr/IzTK+UZ5 muBn3T+fRBU/OHLfeyXuNnu2bkTiv0MRSce7Dl3/8efsCpPS96qlqbU7+D5W/Nx41TjzAmd5 qDp/4sRtq2IXzDhy9IOwKEv6hI07LHl0tmQsn6ai0eYXVfdr49n/K/yUWIozEg21mIuKEwFz 3LeRSQIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/zocnGDyFHoPkzqo6wnL3m-dSS70>
Subject: Re: [babel] I-D Action: draft-ietf-babel-information-model-02.txt
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:19:44 -0000

> On Apr 11, 2018, at 05:50, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
> 
>> 1) babel-hello-[mu]cast-history is an implementation detail documented
>> in an appendix, should it be exposed?
> 
> It's a useful piece of data when debugging issues with wireless links --
> it's easier to understand than the xxcost values.  It's optional in
> Barbara's model, so implementations can ignore it if they don't use
> a Hello history.
> 
> I argue for keeping it (as optional).

Fair enough. That works for me.

David