IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Problem Statement

"Zhangmingui (Martin)" <zhangmingui@huawei.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81D21201F8 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AabQqT7RlDAA for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17F9A1331B0 for <banana@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 21:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DVX33496; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:01:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 05:01:06 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:00:59 +0800
From: "Zhangmingui (Martin)" <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
To: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>, "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] Problem Statement
Thread-Index: AQHTMUHsDI10ZYn6kEen3C+sWdfFgaK+p5mg
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:00:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A6621741@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <9BD99686-8892-4C78-81E6-5991ACD746B9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9BD99686-8892-4C78-81E6-5991ACD746B9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.146.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.59C33983.00D5, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: b9959ae8278f30dea04448e911d6d3fc
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/Bv8n5ejQW-F0-f4yh4BTwgYQoAU>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 04:01:11 -0000

Hi Margaret,

> NEW
> 
> The BANANA WG is chartered to complete the following  work items:
> 	• Informally document/discuss the BANANA problem statement and usage
> scenarios in non-archival documents (e.g. Wiki, Google Doc, etc.)

I can see this item well reflects the spirit of the directions on the page “Support Documents in IETF Working Groups”. Since a support document could sometimes be an expired draft, I'd like to remind that we did have a banana problem statement draft once. 

Thanks,
Mingui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Margaret Cullen
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:22 PM
> To: banana@ietf.org
> Subject: [Banana] Problem Statement
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Some people have indicated that they think it would be good to have a better
> understanding of the problem statement for BANANA.  As Suresh has pointed
> out, there is a move in the IETF to use informal means to gain WG agreement on
> support documentation, like problem statements and use cases, and to avoid
> making those blocking items for WG work.
> 
> In order to make sure that the problem is well-understood by everyone without
> blocking our other work, perhaps we could make the following change to the WG
> charter?
> 
> OLD:
> 
> The BANANA WG is chartered to complete the following  work items:
> 	• Informally document/discuss BANANA usage scenarios in a non-archival
> document (e.g. Wiki, Google Doc, etc.)
> 
> NEW
> 
> The BANANA WG is chartered to complete the following  work items:
> 	• Informally document/discuss the BANANA problem statement and usage
> scenarios in non-archival documents (e.g. Wiki, Google Doc, etc.)
> 
> Thoughts?  Would this address the concerns of people who would like more
> discussion of the problem statement within the WG?
> 
> Thanks,
> Margaret
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email