Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?

Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ddolson@sandvine.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C230131B01 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CFen_0gPREVE for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B395A131B5C for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WTL-EXCHP-2.sandvine.com ([fe80::68ac:f071:19ff:3455]) by wtl-exchp-1.sandvine.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:43:41 -0400
From: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
To: Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>, David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
CC: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
Thread-Index: AdL/tXauEol5v0YGSwSpIScYAk8fmAAI2FiAAAf2s8D//8psgP//2+kW
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:43:40 +0000
Message-ID: <20170718134340.5140562.37503.24048@sandvine.com>
References: <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98A9066BBD@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <9E2FF6E3-383A-4836-827E-B38F9FB78C02@rfc1035.com> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C68ED2D16@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>, <05C2ACEB-0711-4E5A-8A06-C3578B5EF931@darou.fr>
In-Reply-To: <05C2ACEB-0711-4E5A-8A06-C3578B5EF931@darou.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-c2processedorg: b2f06e69-072f-40ee-90c5-80a34e700794
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/Mx5e8bVc7Np3IIof03VIdIlLHAg>
Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:43:44 -0000

Let me state it another way: I think it should be possible to utilize N BANANA tunnels, where N may exceed 2.

I don't recall which draft or email I read that assumed 2.


David Dolson
Sandvine
  Original Message
From: Pierre Pfister
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:52 PM
To: David Allan I
Cc: Jim Reid; Dave Dolson; banana@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?


One single interface/link can also be used to provide multiple ways to access the network (e.g. in case of network multi-homing).
This distinction between interface and "Provisioning Domains" has been defined in [rfc7556].

A BANANA box should be able to aggregate traffic between multiple Provisioning Domains (PvDs) regardless whether those PvDs are on distinct interfaces or not.

- Pierre

> Le 18 juil. 2017 à 13:32, David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com> a écrit :
>
> The discussion is conflating a few concepts....
>
> We have physical interfaces, which can be subdivided for the purpose of accessing the internet or specific closed user groups or VPNs a.k.a. slices.
>
> A BANANA function (not box) would serve for access to a slice where access was available on multiple interfaces. If my CPE wanted to do bandwidth aggregation to more than one slice, more than one function instance would be required.
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Reid
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:17 PM
> To: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
> Cc: banana@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
>
>
>> On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:04, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:
>>
>> In contrast, I think some BANANA documents have explicitly referred to 2 slices.
>
> [citation needed]
>
> AFAICT the banana WG has just about got a charter done and there are no other documents yet.
>
> I think a 5G pipe would be one "path" for a banana device -- handwave! -- alongside wi-fi, DSL or whatever. And if that 5G pipe uses up to 8 network slices, that'll be implementation detail for the 5G provider which is invisible to the banana device. It seems the internal workings of the 5G infrastructure is not going to be exposed to the end user devices that access it. YMMV.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
>
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana