Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text
"Zhangmingui (Martin)" <zhangmingui@huawei.com> Tue, 19 September 2017 03:47 UTC
Return-Path: <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8DF12EC30 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHq8y4_0CVR0 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1DCB1342B8 for <banana@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DVS69706; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 03:47:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 04:47:21 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:47:14 +0800
From: "Zhangmingui (Martin)" <zhangmingui@huawei.com>
To: Michael Menth <menth@uni-tuebingen.de>, "banana@ietf.org" <banana@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text
Thread-Index: AQHTK8y2WLQSjjol9k6N8bLE2LCAAKKwwvKAgArQD+A=
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 03:47:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7A66191A7@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <5C26C1CC-DD97-4329-8ED0-6FF69F29AD2E@gmail.com> <4c9919ed-b503-4092-ccbf-02f9da61ebac@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <4c9919ed-b503-4092-ccbf-02f9da61ebac@uni-tuebingen.de>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.146.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.59C0934B.0044, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5258261bd9083e8dbf985348828b1fe6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/c2Gj4P9xY31a6MB0GFPmNjCzL8g>
Subject: Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 03:47:29 -0000
Hi Margaret, I have read the charter text and found it clear about the problem and work items. I'd like to support it and would like to contribute to the WG. Thanks, Mingui > -----Original Message----- > From: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Menth > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 10:06 PM > To: banana@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text > > Hi Margaret, > > I've read the revised version and find it very clear and reasonable. > Thanks a lot! > > Best wishes, > > Michael > > Am 12.09.2017 um 15:40 schrieb Margaret Cullen: > > > > Hi BANANA Folks, > > > > Based on the meeting in Prague, and the feedback we have received on the > BANANA List regarding the charter Google Doc, I have included the current state > of the BANANA charter text below. I believe that all of the issues have been > addressed, and that this charter is ready to go to the IESG for review. > > > > We’d like to get this charter to the IESG as soon as possible, in the hope of > chartering a WG before the November IETF meeting, so please provide any final > feedback you have on this text to the BANANA list no later than next Tuesday, > September 19th. Thank you. Unless there are any major issues, I will send this > charter (with minor tweaks as needed) to the IESG next Tuesday. > > > > The current working version of the charter text also continues to be visible here: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1byOJ_To6eL1ZBxKSYpTafQbngTBiNwxaK > 7ReIsld9Ek/edit > > > > Thank you, > > Margaret > > > > Charter: BANdwidth Aggregation for Network Access WG > > > > The BANdwidth Aggregation for Network Access (BANANA) Working Group is > chartered to develop solution(s) to support dynamic path selection on a > per-packet basis in networks that have more than one point of attachment to the > Internet. > > > > Bandwidth Aggregation consists of splitting local traffic across multiple Internet > links on a per-packet basis, including the ability to split a single flow across > multiple links when necessary. > > > > It is the goal of this WG to produce a Bandwidth Aggregation solution that will > provide the following benefits: > > > > • Higher Per-Flow Bandwidth: Many Internet links available to homes and > small offices (DSL, Cable, LTE, Satellite, VPNs, etc.) have relatively low bandwidth. > Users may wish to run applications (such as streaming video, or content > up/downloads) that require (or could benefit from) more bandwidth for a single > traffic flow than is available on any of the local links. A Bandwidth Aggregation > solution could supply the needed bandwidth by splitting a single traffic flow > across multiple Internet links. > > • Reduced Cost: Traffic sharing on a per-packet basis allows the full > bandwidth of the lowest-cost link to be used first, only using a higher-cost link > when the lowest-cost link is full. > > • Increased Reliability: When one Internet link goes down, ongoing > application flows can be moved to another link, preventing service disruption. > > > > Proposed BANANA solutions use different approaches (e.g. tunnels, proxies, > etc.) to split and recombine traffic, but at an abstract level, they involve a local > (hardware or software) component on the multi-access network, a remote > component within the Internet or at the remote end, and mechanisms for those > components to find each other, exchange signalling information, and direct traffic > to each other. We refer to the functional components at each end as the Local > and Remote “BANANA Boxes”, and we refer to the methods they use to direct > traffic to each other as a “BANANA Encapsulations”. > > > > [Note: Despite our use of the term “Boxes”, it should be understood that a > BANANA Box might be a software component running on a piece of hardware > with another primary purpose (e.g. a CPE router). Similarly, the use of the term > “Encapsulation” does not mean that all BANANA Encapsulations will add an > explicit encapsulation header.] > > > > The Bandwidth Aggregation solutions developed in this group will be designed > to work in multi-provider scenarios (i.e. they will not depend on all of the > aggregated links being provided by a single Internet access provider). > > > > The BANANA WG is chartered to complete the following work items: > > • Informally document/discuss BANANA usage scenarios in a non-archival > document (e.g. Wiki, Google Doc, etc.) > > • Determine how Local and Remote BANANA Boxes find each other (i.e. > define BANANA provisioning/configuration mechanism(s)). > > • Specify a signalling protocol that can be used to send control information > between BANANA Boxes, including: > > • IP Prefixes of access links > > • Information about link status and properties (including congestion) > > • Information needed by BANANA Encapsulations > > • Determining which flows are/are not eligible for BANANA > Encapsulation > > • Select (and extend, if necessary) an existing tunneling encapsulation (e.g. > GRE) for sending traffic between BANANA Boxes. > > > > The BANANA WG will consider existing IETF protocols, where applicable, as the > basis for the work items listed above. > > > > The Banana WG will work also with other IETF WGs (and other SDOs, as > requested) that define additional BANANA Encapsulations (if any) to ensure > that the protocols defined by the BANANA WG will meet the needs of those > additional Encapsulations. > > > > Milestones > > • Apr 2018 Adopt WG draft for provisioning/configuration mechanism > > • Apr 2018 Adopt WG draft for signaling protocol > > • Apr 2018 Adopt WG draft(s) for tunnel encapsulation(s) > > • Feb 2019 WGLC on provisioning/configuration mechanism > > • Feb 2019 WGLC on signaling protocol > > • Feb 2019 WGLC on tunnel encapsulation(s) > > • Aug 2019 Send provisioning/configuration mechanism to the IESG > > • Aug 2019 Send signalling protocol to the IESG > > • Aug 2019 Send tunnel encapsulation(s) to the IESG > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Banana mailing list > > Banana@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana > > > > -- > Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth > University of Tuebingen > Faculty of Science > Department of Computer Science > Chair of Communication Networks > Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany > phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505 > fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220 > mailto:menth@uni-tuebingen.de > http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de > > _______________________________________________ > Banana mailing list > Banana@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
- [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text Michael Menth
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text Zhangmingui (Martin)
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text chenlihao
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text GENG Liang
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text N.Leymann
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text philip.eardley
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Banana] Final(?) BANANA Charter Text liudx@gsta.com