IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] De bananibus

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7945C129406 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5EMfyLgEzrl for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E21B128DF3 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/56228) with ESMTP id v2VGA6ea024390; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:10:06 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2A4D78C3; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id xpU3C3LnZbio; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:10:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ijon.irif.fr (dhcp-8558.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.133.88]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5418BD78B7; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:10:17 -0500
Message-ID: <87mvc1fmvq.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Cc: banana@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <93EAA216-E83E-4C6C-8A6B-AC4EF10A335C@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <87mvc2woud.wl-jch@irif.fr> <93EAA216-E83E-4C6C-8A6B-AC4EF10A335C@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 58DE7F5E.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 58DE7F5E.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 58DE7F5E.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/jNvJQbT8JaszH0prB7B9O2UC6mE>
Subject: Re: [Banana] De bananibus
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:10:10 -0000

>> Third, I think there are some fun algorithmic issues involved, and I'd
>> suggest checking the published literature on multipath VPNs (I'm not sure
>> there's much on the subject).

> I think/hope this is out of scope for banana and the ietf.

I agree that this does not require standardisation, at most informational
implementation recommendations.  OTOH, in my experience IETF is rather
friendly to working code, and discussing algorithmic and implementation
concerns on this list is perfectly legitimate.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email