Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE7D129482 for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cvqwdb-B5csu for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E526129459 for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 07:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6IEt9df028829 for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:55:09 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 59AE72060A6 for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50843205F97 for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.73] ([132.166.84.73]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6IEt8sl001640 for <banana@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:55:08 +0200
To: banana@ietf.org
References: <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E98A9066BBD@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com> <9E2FF6E3-383A-4836-827E-B38F9FB78C02@rfc1035.com> <E6C17D2345AC7A45B7D054D407AA205C68ED2D16@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> <05C2ACEB-0711-4E5A-8A06-C3578B5EF931@darou.fr> <20170718134340.5140562.37503.24048@sandvine.com> <a9ca8b12c03d4036baf9938308153ff1@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <de0d7fa0-9e23-7759-47d9-9a8edc255b5a@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 16:55:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a9ca8b12c03d4036baf9938308153ff1@HE105662.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/k2-OFuXgIiy7cydFK62I7qUJMqA>
Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:55:14 -0000

some banana-like trials started with two 3G USB dongles and ended with 
dedicated boards including up to 6 SIM cards.

Le 18/07/2017 à 16:12, N.Leymann@telekom.de a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I think there are "banana-like" deployments out there, using two links. But I agree that there is no reason to limit banana to two.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Nic
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Dave Dolson
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Juli 2017 15:44
> An: Pierre Pfister; David Allan I
> Cc: Jim Reid; banana@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
> 
> Let me state it another way: I think it should be possible to utilize N BANANA tunnels, where N may exceed 2.
> 
> I don't recall which draft or email I read that assumed 2.
> 
> 
> David Dolson
> Sandvine
>    Original Message
> From: Pierre Pfister
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:52 PM
> To: David Allan I
> Cc: Jim Reid; Dave Dolson; banana@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
> 
> 
> One single interface/link can also be used to provide multiple ways to access the network (e.g. in case of network multi-homing).
> This distinction between interface and "Provisioning Domains" has been defined in [rfc7556].
> 
> A BANANA box should be able to aggregate traffic between multiple Provisioning Domains (PvDs) regardless whether those PvDs are on distinct interfaces or not.
> 
> - Pierre
> 
>> Le 18 juil. 2017 à 13:32, David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com> a écrit :
>>
>> The discussion is conflating a few concepts....
>>
>> We have physical interfaces, which can be subdivided for the purpose of accessing the internet or specific closed user groups or VPNs a.k.a. slices.
>>
>> A BANANA function (not box) would serve for access to a slice where access was available on multiple interfaces. If my CPE wanted to do bandwidth aggregation to more than one slice, more than one function instance would be required.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Banana [mailto:banana-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Reid
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:17 PM
>> To: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>
>> Cc: banana@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Banana] How many links can be BANANA'd together?
>>
>>
>>> On 18 Jul 2017, at 12:04, Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In contrast, I think some BANANA documents have explicitly referred to 2 slices.
>>
>> [citation needed]
>>
>> AFAICT the banana WG has just about got a charter done and there are no other documents yet.
>>
>> I think a 5G pipe would be one "path" for a banana device -- handwave! -- alongside wi-fi, DSL or whatever. And if that 5G pipe uses up to 8 network slices, that'll be implementation detail for the 5G provider which is invisible to the banana device. It seems the internal workings of the 5G infrastructure is not going to be exposed to the end user devices that access it. YMMV.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Banana mailing list
>> Banana@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Banana mailing list
>> Banana@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Banana mailing list
> Banana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana
>