Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-05
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Sun, 07 February 2010 10:11 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F703A6D06 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmDoEZAwrZas for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0040A3A6898 for <behave@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (unknown [213.144.149.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DE5C1ECB4E8; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:12:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:12:05 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <20100207101204.GA1174@shinkuro.com>
References: <E4561B14EE2A3E4E9D478EBFB5416E1B29B9976F@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E4561B14EE2A3E4E9D478EBFB5416E1B29B9976F@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-05
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:11:17 -0000
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 03:01:10AM +0000, Dave Thaler wrote: > My comments and suggested wording changes on this document > are marked up in the PDF at > http://research.microsoft.com/~dthaler/draft-ietf-behave-dns64-05.pdf A question about wording changes: in several places, you suggested changing the English description of RCODE values from their names in RFC 1035 to their usual representation from implementations. For instance, you suggest changing "RCODE=3 (Name Error)" to "RCODE=3 (NXDOMAIN)" and "RCODE=2 (Server failure)" to "RCODE=2 (SERVFAIL)". Any special reason why? If we're going to include NXDOMAIN, we have another normative reference, because NXDOMAIN isn't defined at all in RFC 1035 (neither is SERVFAIL, but it's at least an obvious abbrev). That's why I prefer to stick with the definitions in 1035. Ok? A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc.
- [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-05 Dave Thaler
- Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-… marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [BEHAVE] Comments on draft-ietf-behave-dns64-… Andrew Sullivan