Re: [BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5766 (4143)

[Philip Matthews <[e-mail]>]

Looks valid to me.
I have already forwarded it to Alan Johnson who is working on the turn-bis document.

Philip


On 2014-10-23, at 6:12 , RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5766,
> "Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5766&eid=4143
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Florian Waltersdorfer <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 1.Intro...
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> attempt discover a direct communication path; that is, a
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> attempt to discover a direct communication path; that is, a
> 
> Notes
> -----
> line 177 in the txt version, attempt *to* do something
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5766 (draft-ietf-behave-turn-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
> Publication Date    : April 2010
> Author(s)           : R. Mahy, P. Matthews, J. Rosenberg
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
>