Re: [BEHAVE] ***SPAM*** 6.352 (5) Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt

kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp> Wed, 14 August 2013 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <kaname@nttv6.jp>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8BF11E81CF for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sapcDcCZlR+5 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guri.nttv6.jp (guri.nttv6.jp [IPv6:2402:c800:ff06:a::4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6883711E81CD for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z.nttv6.jp (z.nttv6.jp [192.168.8.15]) by guri.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id 9165E4E738; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:11:07 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (fujiko.nttv6.jp [115.69.228.141]) by z.nttv6.jp (NTTv6MTA) with ESMTP id 71CC23B730; Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:11:07 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <520AD927.206@nttv6.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:11:03 +0900
From: kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yutaka Ishizaki <ishizaki@dti.ad.jp>
References: <20130813.125445.747003470323048065.ishizaki@dti.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20130813.125445.747003470323048065.ishizaki@dti.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] ***SPAM*** 6.352 (5) Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:11:15 -0000

Ishizaki-san

Thanks for your comment and positive feedback.

We haven't noticed about GCM's behavior.
It's very important information.
I will check on it and get back to you.

Anyway, we also want to know about detail.

Thanks,
kaname

(2013/08/13 12:54), Yutaka Ishizaki wrote:
> Hi Kaname,
>
> Thanks for published this document. it was a great help to me.
>
> I have a comment on the sections 6.1.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nishizuka-cgn-deployment-considerations-00#section-6.1
> this section is described that TCP NAT table time-out value is set to 300sec (5min),
> and the setting didn't break the behavior of applications.
>
> in my experience, it seems not enough to behave the GCM (Google Cloud Messaging).
> It seems to need more than 5 minutes.
>
> I can not find any document about protocol detail of GCM. (keepalive interval, etc)
>
> Let me know, if somebody knows the details.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> -- Yutaka Ishizaki
>
>
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm kaname from NTT communications in Japan.
>> We are testing CGN under the support of Japanese Government.
>> Now, we've uploaded a new draft based on the result of our verification.
>> The useful information about the average consumption of the ports are available on the document.
>> Please look through it, and all kind of feedback are welcome.
>>
>> By conducting realistic experiment, this draft is answering to "draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements-10" which will be the newest RFC \
> very soon.
>> The document is *NOT* intended to be Standards Track. It's for Informational.
>> The wrong description is just mere mistake, so we'll soon correct it in the next revision.
>>
>> The full report of our work will be available soon on the Web in English.
>> I'll also announce it when it's available to this mailing-list.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> kaname
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave


-- 
----
Kaname Nishizuka
Innovative Architecture Center
NTT Communications Corporation
+81-50-3812-4704