Re: [BEHAVE] Closing the behave WG

Reinaldo Penno <rpenno@juniper.net> Thu, 04 August 2011 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rpenno@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E8321F8B6A for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lr8ApZx+bgwf for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EFB21F874A for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTjpRjWsYfzdVEoj7TJBSvyYbeitQNH+p@postini.com; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:00:32 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:58:24 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:58:23 -0400
From: Reinaldo Penno <rpenno@juniper.net>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:58:21 -0400
Thread-Topic: [BEHAVE] Closing the behave WG
Thread-Index: AcxSOz1+np/vF0xnTkWaM1paeuvypwAQQmoO
Message-ID: <CA5F9F2D.4CE8E%rpenno@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <285AA91F41624C6B963A45FECC73F56E@davidPC>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.9.0.110114
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Closing the behave WG
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:00:19 -0000

On 8/3/11 5:12 PM, "David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> As Responsible Area Director, I have received a request from the
> behave WG chairs to consider closing the behave working group, rather
> than rechartering to do additional work.
> 

I vote for rechartering. There is very important work to be done in this
area, specially given the CGN traction in the market. I would like to see at
least the following drafts published.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-logging-02
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-behave-rfc4787-5382-5508-bis-00

> The chairs and the IESG agree that closing the WG after completing the
> current milestones would be a good thing, to signal that the chartered
> behave work items supporting transition to IPv6 have been completed.

I understand BEHAVE have been around for a while and if it is taking a lot
of the chairs' time maybe we could consider changing the chairs for the next
rechartering. 

> 
> During ietf81, the chairs discussed with the working group the
> possible closing of the working group. Additional work, such as those
> drafts identified in the chairs' slides, can be proposed for
> completion in existing working groups (or in new working groups).
> None
> of this would be automatic; the proponents would need to convince an
> existing WG to adopt their draft, or would need to convince the IESG a
> new working group is justified using the normal methods for requesting
> a new working group. The behave chairs have agreed to serve as
> technical advisors to working groups that take on such work, if
> needed. 
> 
> In my opinion, the sense of the room was to support this closure.
> 
> As Responsible area director, I plan to make a decision on WG closure
> in the next few weeks, and would like to give the WG mailing list
> members a chance to provide feedback on this proposed closure. Please
> send substantive comments to the
> behave@ietf.org mailing list by 2011-08-15, with the above Subject
> line.
> 
> David Harrington
> Director, IETF Transport Area
> ietfdbh@comcast.net (preferred for ietf)
> dbharrington@huaweisymantec.com
> +1 603 828 1401 (cell)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Behave mailing list
> Behave@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave