[BEHAVE] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt>

Linfeng Zheng <linfeng.john.zheng@gmail.com> Fri, 14 October 2011 06:03 UTC

Return-Path: <linfeng.john.zheng@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08A621F8C2A for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.470, BAYES_50=0.001, CN_BODY_35=0.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MI9-lWRdyqdo for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E607721F8C1F for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so2174238iab.31 for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ZGfR3UebE/xBf3/2fGbqoCiYCeMz4/PyysXzJjg8Wws=; b=dA3BSHNnwcdz7YBeEEGm9uNjn5Wa3Wu4F2ec+JASX4dOtsSIg4vGQB/Ep5bZ+U0eoA z7k2XGUxXnEkkb9xns2Qo9JJnN2hjgs6bj7XQreFNKRh0fVIRfFT3u8y/bmOJbYbp3vC W7jW3ZVgKGe9/ZrP8oqJUH3H6cwPVGPWsnA60=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.70.131 with SMTP id d3mr3029090ibj.90.1318572192449; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.153.66 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG==GCCOsOcSRbjEHXFXtd6swHfr91D9dujdK5FRJ-PNGTPidg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG==GCCOsOcSRbjEHXFXtd6swHfr91D9dujdK5FRJ-PNGTPidg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:03:12 +0800
Message-ID: <CAG==GCB=q5HOGgJke7XgR-7TcxbDHBP18x2up=YWK7W94v-uQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linfeng Zheng <linfeng.john.zheng@gmail.com>
To: behave@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015176f131224443104af3c03b9"
Subject: [BEHAVE] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt>
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 06:03:14 -0000

I means Host-initiated NAT464.

I had a draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-host-initiated-nat-01.txt,
expired though.

It seems work for active-tranfer, too.

- John CCIE#8670

---------- 已转发邮件 ----------
发件人: Linfeng Zheng <linfeng.john.zheng@gmail.com>
日期: 2011年10月14日 下午1:59
主题: Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt>
收件人: behave@ietf.org


> -----Original Message-----
> From: GangChen [mailto:phdgang <phdgang> at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 2:53 AM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: Hui Deng; behave at ietf.org; ietf at ietf.org; softwires at ietf.org;
> Cameron Byrne
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt>
> (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed Standard
>
> >>
> >> Option 1:
> >>
> >> +---------------+
> >> |BIH(FTP sever) |----------NAT64-------FTP Client
> >> +---------------+
> >>
> >>
> >> Option 2:
> >>
> >> +---------------+
> >> |BIH(FTP sever) |--------------FTP Client
> >> +---------------+
> >>
> >> In the case of Option 1, it can't work since NAT64 couldn't support
> >> IPv4 initiated session
> >
> > I agree it would fail with a passive-mode transfer.  But it should
> > work with an active-mode transfer.
> >
>
>> In an active-mode transfer, IPv4 client needs initiate the TCP
>> connection to a port on the FTP sever in advance. Afterwards, FTP
>> server connects back to the client.
>> I'm not sure how could NAT64 support the first step (i.e. IPv4
>> initiated TCP connection)?

>Static mapping in the NAT64, for the FTP control channel (port
>21 or an alternate port).  That could be done by the user's
>profile (draft-cheng-behave-nat-fwd-port-radius-ext), PCP, or
>a web portal that manages the NAT64's configuration.

Would HI-NAT works?

>-d


> Many thanks
>
> Gang

Thanks, John

郑林峰 John Linfeng Zheng
电话(Tel): 86-25-8577-1689
手机(Mobile): 15195762065




-- 
光明所结的果子就是一切良善、公义、诚实。       弗5:9

郑林峰 John Linfeng Zheng
电话(Tel): 86-25-8577-1689
手机(Mobile): 15195762065