Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64
Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Wed, 06 January 2010 21:21 UTC
Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F3C3A68BB for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:21:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoxeHHn6mm3k for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 412B73A685B for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 98364 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jan 2010 21:14:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1262812487; bh=8JSG9e7NEbI6gNLB1CxVarApNy6pInQgcXL787JFEyY=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gnJYnWYU+SmedgmvV3kgU1F0g31b4NFKE7KK13cxJLMfauBX62ISHySstOi03RAk53iiwNA/Tf7MipcjWa3qh5Uo11KporA31bbXIWnymqeUHRfQSQ0PqhNz4/2DbxyZxzyMmpR0jO/KpSp9f4zuvBQzkfmQtIwEg4wsEn18z7Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M7hU6FMRyRXQmCSqp244c9hjIzwM+BPFH/PgoLAIGioEeGt3fhNTzOb3HN8HOBG9tZZpuR/7IsWEDD0sKOG3BPPMpAvUpubzsQuVcxpJ0s38bF978uLjcvCn41lr/TDlt+gxyNDUNBm9zDQkwDauuXmJA6k1Pem8n15RSwtHtYo=;
Message-ID: <772513.98030.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: q3R6kbMVM1k64KpX195WODbtFEB9t_RwqHFnGjecqHm0MPobO5_zuSB.SadHy64cE3CM6H9DAex.yq5XGMfLfaUJaYucgxcSQjNCtYXFBYpk27_uGc2mw9lBYAbgwUlcn0oDp3JT7eIBtOvlqVLm.yqkbxNmzHXCkJgoR2mKhA_cPBSFPLHHdBqQ9rfAXgjnqXaMhtDm4HgvZA9T_vBcbnLGGNogEKoyZKBz3TXQUytmfAfS1GV1qSR7OnB02UAg6MJeCYwqvu9MqmJP3.WwqXi1WDXr3ruHr.lzXtiXPJvG.nOEwQrCvUkR.V.zgYXF2qkYWpr5MlCEElhkU0yWrozTnaZehENMZGqP0Kl5
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:14:47 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/240.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
References: <C76A4F56.2EDF%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:14:47 -0800
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, cb.list6@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <C76A4F56.2EDF%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:17:17 -0800
Cc: B.Smith@bell.ca, 3gv6@ietf.org, behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:21:28 -0000
Hi Raj, ----- Original Message ---- > From: "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> > To: cb.list6@gmail.com > Cc: behave@ietf.org; B.Smith@bell.ca; 3gv6@ietf.org > Sent: Wed, January 6, 2010 2:31:50 PM > Subject: Re: [3gv6] [BEHAVE] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 > > > > > On 1/6/10 2:15 PM, "ext Cameron Byrne" wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:53 AM, wrote: > >> > >> Inline: > >> > >> > >> On 1/6/10 12:29 PM, "lebbatdot@cogeco.ca" wrote: > >> > >>> Raj > >>> > >>> Not sure I understand you. > >>> Going back to my initial concern. > >>> > >>> Dual stack IPv4/6 is the recomended approach at the moment for 3GPP (and > >>> other networks. > >>> > >>> At some point in time there will be IPv6 only devices. > >> > >> Key word here being "At some point"... Worrying about the scenario when we > >> have IPv6 only devices at the moment is premature. DS devices will be the > >> norm for a long time. > > > > This is not a correct statement. Many mobile operators have exhausted > > public and private IPv4 addresses. > > I agree that many operators may not have large public IPv4 address pools. > And that is a concern. But what do you mean by operators having exhausted > private IPv4 addresses? > > > With machine to machine, the problem becomes worse. > > Sure. If the concern is w.r.t M2M, I don't see why these would not just use > IPv6. It is a given that M2M and similar solutions will require large number > of IP addresses. Given that there is no legacy to worry about, why not just > run these over IPv6. The 3GPP network is already capable of assigning IPv6 > prefixes. > > > So, IPv6-only will likely be a primary > > mass-market services with NAT64 in the next few years. > > Maybe. I sure hope so :) I guess you are concurring with IPv6-only part. For NAT64, I was reading Wassim & Charlie's draft (draft-haddad-mext-nat64-mobility-harmful) which describes some problems associated with NAT64 for the mobile nodes that use Mobile IPv6. I think that synthetic addresses create problems in case the nodes are mobile and in this list all nodes are mobile :). ...snipped the rest as it became huge. Regards, Behcet
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cao,Zhen
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 lebbatdot
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cameron Byrne
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cameron Byrne
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Behcet Sarikaya
- [BEHAVE] 答复: [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 周博
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Liu Hong
- [BEHAVE] Economics of Dual Stack vs. Single Stack… B.Smith
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cameron Byrne
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cameron Byrne
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 刘大鹏
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 David Crowe
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [BEHAVE] [3gv6] FW: DNS Assignment for NAT64 Cameron Byrne