Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP
Senthil Sivakumar <ssenthil@cisco.com> Wed, 23 February 2005 04:11 UTC
From: Senthil Sivakumar <ssenthil@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:11:07 -0800
Subject: Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCP
In-Reply-To: <20050222030742.GA14030@cs.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20050222132837.03404688@mira-sjcd-2.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I am surprised by this parallel effort while there is another draft on TCP behavior already submitted and waiting for reviews. I am pretty sure that you are already aware of this work (since you were a co-author and decided to withdraw at the last minute). But anyway, I don't see a lot of differences in the content in this draft from the other TCP draft that I, Kaushik and Bryan had submitted. Chairs, Could you please clarify as to what is your stand on this parallel effort? Senthil At 07:07 PM 2/21/2005 -0800, nagendra modadugu wrote: I must apologize for the delayed notification about a new draft -- the draft got held up as a result of a buggy IPR statement (now fixed). The draft is a TCP counterpart to the NAT-UDP draft by Audet & Jennings. I have attempted to reproduce as little material possible from the NAT-UDP draft while following its template. As a result, this draft may be read as a "diff" to the NAT-UDP draft (though there is only one conflicting recommendation, for which see below). Some elements require expansion following further discussion (timer values for instance). The recommendation on "Port Preservation" in this draft (=RECOMMENDED) differs from the recommendation made in the NAT-UDP draft (a brief discussion on this issue is given in Section 7.1). If there is a consensus for "Port Preservation" preservation behavior, then this change ought to be folded into the NAT-UDP or protocol independent behavior drafts. nagendra -- http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-modadugu-nat-tcp-00.txt Abstract This document specifies requirements for NAT devices when handling TCP traffic. In order to arrive at the requirements, basic terminology regarding NAT TCP handling is defined. The purpose of this document is to provide a specification of TCP handling by NAT devices so that TCP-using applications can work consistently. _______________________________________________ Ietf-behave mailing list Ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave
- [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requireme… nagendra modadugu
- RE: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Francois Audet
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Senthil Sivakumar
- [Ietf-behave] VAD and NATs Medhavi Bhatia
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… nagendra modadugu
- RE: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Francois Audet
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… nagendra modadugu
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Kaushik Biswas
- [Ietf-behave] multiple individual drafts on the s… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Bryan Ford
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Bryan Ford
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… nagendra modadugu
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… nagendra modadugu
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Kaushik Biswas
- TCP Keep Alives (was:: Re: [Ietf-behave] New draf… Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New draft: NAT Behavioral Requi… Pyda Srisuresh