[BEHAVE] Terminology question for draft-xli-behave-v4v6-prefix-00

Dong Zhang <zhangdong_rh@huaweisymantec.com> Thu, 23 July 2009 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangdong_rh@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C323A6817 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.031
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.925, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Trer3YWPUjOe for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta2.huaweisymantec.com (unknown [218.17.155.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614773A685F for <behave@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_stGS9hvegTWqEbIsSjSNxQ)"
Received: from hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com ([172.26.3.42]) by hstga02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KN800MCQ69CTB90@hstga02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for behave@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:00:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z90001956 ([10.27.154.181]) by hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.03 (built Apr 24 2009; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KN800EF769CPT10@hstml02-in.huaweisymantec.com> for behave@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:00:48 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:00:56 +0800
From: Dong Zhang <zhangdong_rh@huaweisymantec.com>
To: xing <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
Message-id: <200907231600563587086@huaweisymantec.com>
X-Mailer: Foxmail 6, 10, 201, 20 [cn]
Cc: behave <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: [BEHAVE] Terminology question for draft-xli-behave-v4v6-prefix-00
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:04:46 -0000

Hi Xing

I'm quite confused with the terminology when I read the draft.
The draft shows:
IPG4:  The global IPv4 addresses
ISP4:  The ISP's IPv4 prefix
ISP6:  The ISP's IPv6 prefix
IPG4prefix:  The IPv6 address representation of IPG4
ISP4prefix:  The IPv6 address representation of ISP4.

I have some questions:
1) Is IPG4prefix a prefix or an address? According to the definition, the IPv6 address representation of IPG4, I guess it is an address. But why you include the word "prefix" in it?
2)In figure 4, Represent the IPv6 addresses in IPv4 (stateful)
                    +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
      ISP6prefix|               ISP6                         |
                    +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
                     \                                           /
                        \                                     /
                          Mapping is based on session
                                   initiated states
                                       \  /
                                        \/
                                     -+-+-+
                                     |IPv4|
                                     |pool|
                                     -+-+-+
Now that ISP6 is a prefix, what do you mean here?

I feel that the terminology is not clear. And the naming has no rules. IMHO, it isn't convenient for understanding.
Could you please explain these more clearly?  

Thank you very much.
B.R.

2009-07-23 



Dong Zhang