Re: [BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6535 (3221)

"Hui Deng" <denghui@chinamobile.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 08:49 UTC

From: Hui Deng <denghui@chinamobile.com>
To: 'RFC Errata System' <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, bill.huang@chinamobile.com, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com, wes@mti-systems.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, dwing@cisco.com, dthaler@microsoft.com
References: <20120510072612.C0A0C62180@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120510072612.C0A0C62180@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:49:34 +0800
Message-ID: <007f01cd2e89$d2cc6420$78652c60$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: Ac0ufoXZmkUcjEClRhi5eou0A8H5+wACy4Kg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Language: zh-cn
Cc: etienne.duble@imag.fr, behave@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6535 (3221)
Precedence: list

Hello all

It should be verified, it has been swapped between two documents
Thanks a lot

-Hui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 3:26 PM
> To: bill.huang@chinamobile.com; denghui@chinamobile.com;
> teemu.savolainen@nokia.com; wes@mti-systems.com;
> martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu; dwing@cisco.com; dthaler@microsoft.com
> Cc: etienne.duble@imag.fr; behave@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6535 (3221)
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6535, "Dual-Stack
Hosts
> Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6535&eid=3221
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Etienne Dubl?<etienne.duble@imag.fr>
> 
> Section: 7
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> This document recommends the socket API-layer implementation option over
> network layer translation, i.e., it recommends the approach introduced in
RFC
> 2767 over the approach of RFC 3338.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> This document recommends the socket API-layer implementation option over
> network layer translation, i.e., it recommends the approach introduced in
RFC
> 3338 over the approach of RFC 2767.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> RFC numbers are swapped in this sentence. RFC 3338 describes the
socket-API
> layer implementation, RFC 2767 describes the alternative (network-based)
> implementation.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
"Reply
> All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision
is
> reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and
edit the
> report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6535 (draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Dual-Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)
> Publication Date    : February 2012
> Author(s)           : B. Huang, H. Deng, T. Savolainen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6535 (322… RFC Errata System
Re: [BEHAVE] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6535 … Hui Deng