IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] review of draft-penno-behave-rfc4787-5382-5508-bis

Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com> Wed, 03 July 2013 06:06 UTC

Return-Path: <washam.fan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AE121F9C45 for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BOV8q2xZcODU for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249B621F9C2C for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id lf11so3307617vcb.26 for <behave@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5hK9xdWqLPj+3ziDfAvVChGH77Tq4D6u0PSO0b3nkAE=; b=OLLYqbmzLUfVs1JbRsI3HgAq9aVh4qg0YKJuwp3aW6DYg3R9YVR3gkBAh4Wk2Zgy3Q Q/eR7hgUfNdmp99NtruKZrlF3/u25yANLz+DCxLH9xrgN/tqiQWK5Z0PjEmckqeR8ze/ eyO0z+fFtbwMdmxbt7w7fD9bV57Z0KNJk5lN78sMD0iRvagQt0PfMaLbHopYJd3KKFPl QyusFBuTzlZS+xXXmusH5CPGFIm9epR+UnGehAtb8EtOdABZ+8IISXRe/Y8D+K9yyXoU okNWTAqioMT/qaACxvj5dRuQ+FugvtnOpSfVmX89+sRWSTqeeZSmLVGv4zbWXYaOf67p t/rA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.41.77 with SMTP id n13mr9054833vce.36.1372831582549; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 23:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.158.133 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2013 23:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51C3F11D.1030501@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <3a724be2431cf7249b3d46cf378f85bf@cacaoweb.org> <51BFE896.2000006@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1d235e99689e55aba94258ff65895f75@cacaoweb.org> <51C3F11D.1030501@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 14:06:22 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAuHL_CyFLr8yfsnEdkXFQMKf77m2z+ydGxaS3D0ALiSkMUiLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Washam Fan <washam.fan@gmail.com>
To: Kengo Naito <naito.kengo@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a90eed07c6404e0954279"
Cc: Behave <behave@ietf.org>, ivan@cacaoweb.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] review of draft-penno-behave-rfc4787-5382-5508-bis
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 06:06:23 -0000

Hi,




>
>> 3.1.2.2 I was unable to fully grasp the idea and its relationship with the
>> TIME_WAIT state, it would be nice if you could elaborate on this.
>>
> In this mechanism, usable port set are splited to each client, which means
> that for each port,
> arriving packets have monotonically increasing values of TCP timestamp or
> ISN.
> In this case, as values are monotonically increasing, 6191 will work and
> terminate TIME_WAIT.
>
> Please note that linux kernel checks if values are monotonically
increasing for each remote IP instead of (IP, port) pair. at least  for
kernel 3.6.6 and earlier.

B.R.
washam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email