[BEHAVE] logging drafts
Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 18:11 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A76021F8E0B for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0y5fqq0WrUNP for <behave@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B121F8E73 for <behave@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=649; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363198266; x=1364407866; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=8AnvXo3ZUiPlzdXh5szyBaVX+60DG0p/0BGgPi1CSXA=; b=jTxopORHP9+HJYRAACfePCFcv+N8BPCWr80fo3uOtn20YfvKTTYYUicX WTzXn96Knj20Mf1XCYG4jbFxqa47gPygCQGLTsoJ1ALXdjpwWyibYMQeg muy3VumDOLGBEccYUphxSJHHtIki4x33xWxNssWvX7ipmHY1JTBkLEymZ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwFADbAQFGrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDh1y8eoFZFm0Hgi88P4EyDIgmDcMQF48NgmZhA5ZWgR+PV4MmIA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,838,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="72258809"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2013 18:11:06 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn7-905.cisco.com (sjc-vpn7-905.cisco.com [10.21.147.137]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2DIB5YZ025915; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:11:06 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:11:05 -0400
Message-Id: <65DAA8E7-B1A8-4581-80F2-D1734999BA1A@cisco.com>
To: "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [BEHAVE] logging drafts
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:11:07 -0000
The two NAT logging drafts were presented at the BEHAVE meeting at IETF86 (draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-logging-06 and draft-ietf-behave-syslog-nat-logging-00). They are both WG documents and based on the feedback at the meeting, we would like to see: * an update of the table presented at the meeting (slide 6 of http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/86/slides/slides-86-behave-2.pdf). * text added to the SYSLOG and IPFIX documents explaining their applicability. * discussion on the list to reach consensus that SYSLOG and IPFIX should, or should not, send different events because of their different applicability. -d
- [BEHAVE] logging drafts Dan Wing
- Re: [BEHAVE] logging drafts Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [BEHAVE] logging drafts Tom Taylor
- Re: [BEHAVE] logging drafts Tom Taylor
- Re: [BEHAVE] logging drafts Dan Wing