IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] I-D Action:draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-06.txt

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 05 February 2010 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE4F28C12E for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BsKZmMuza-ux for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (mail-ew0-f228.google.com [209.85.219.228]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B308028C130 for <behave@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 05:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so4290263ewy.28 for <behave@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:42:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=wXitHDFk3m1wzcE7sK5tuX3xcDHcHyxXOOQD+fBkPLU=; b=ljzaWExRu5L8Zx6fLL0GTnYphM3Tk2gtvVg3fFQvT1LZYTD8BywNOOGJ0eutJGRjff hLtsGnHr36etEEMFLaJDV0SZZzBnPfbnzwvuClpFn55DhEabSZkoBk5iAxGYjbU0raw9 KldZYW2dxfLxcwnmQ3XGsNiRF3NG2xa6SW8ts=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=NIQRi+qQvBDSah53OjpB59ZNik4hMrxdH/NkE2j/CBTKHp0SkQ6cBqFlJaA1Gbi5OC /yiIdl0T5E+BYRjYfIwkG4q8GxMst56i5lJ7I5n5tHsS5R+HgZk5af+oDZh1PH1/NVId 39M10RfOHSzmlr/XDQtEJDs32OR5Ymm2qw6bk=
Received: by 10.213.44.18 with SMTP id y18mr571255ebe.69.1265377352515; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.254.1.96? ([192.100.123.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm943225ewy.8.2010.02.05.05.42.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:42:30 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B5D7167.4050801@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:41:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E1C59E7D-207F-452A-BDBD-725BBCEEA02C@gmail.com>
References: <20100125101503.20B5F3A68A3@core3.amsl.com> <4B5D7167.4050801@cernet.edu.cn>
To: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: behave@ietf.org, Behave Chairs <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] I-D Action:draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-06.txt
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:41:46 -0000

Hi,

On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Xing Li wrote:

> Hi, All,
> 
> For draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-xlate-05 during WGLC, we have 4 reviews, many
> active discussions on the mailing list and mails to the authors. Thanks
> for the reviews and comments. Here is a summary of the main issues
> discussed during WGLC.
> 
> (1) Discussion if translator is a router (for TTL/Hop-limit handling)
> Conclusion: Translator is a router. We made the wording consistent in
> different places of the document (in sections 1.4, 2.1, 2.7, 3.1 and
> 3.6. of the xlate-05)
> 

In Section 3.1 it says:

   ...
   If the DF bit is set and the MTU of the next-hop interface is less
   than or equal to the total length value of the IPv4 packet minus 20,
   the translator MUST send an ICMPv4 "Fragmentation Needed" error
   message to the IPv4 source address.
   ...
  

Am I just reading/understanding this wrong but shouldn't the text say?

   ...
   If the DF bit is set and the MTU of the next-hop interface is less
   than to the total length value of the IPv4 packet plus 20,
   the translator MUST send an ICMPv4 "Fragmentation Needed" error
   message to the IPv4 source address.
   ...

-Jouni

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email