Re: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 (3737)

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Wed, 25 September 2013 14:56 UTC

From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "jdrosen@cisco.com" <jdrosen@cisco.com>, "rohan@ekabal.com" <rohan@ekabal.com>, "philip_matthews@magma.ca" <philip_matthews@magma.ca>, "dwing@cisco.com" <dwing@cisco.com>, "spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, "mls.ietf@gmail.com" <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "dwing@cisco.com" <dwing@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 (3737)
Thread-Index: AQHOuegj9CVXeTS6cECJBlJ0YaB4XZnWir8Q
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:56:09 +0000
Message-ID: <d5f6ce81e75b44cd84bcfac5fe7f5b3b@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20130925120250.389F58E016@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130925120250.389F58E016@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>, "spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 (3737)
Precedence: list

I think Spencer is correct.

Per http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html
guideline #2, I think this erratum should be marked Hold for Document Update.

-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:03 AM
> To: jdrosen@cisco.com; rohan@ekabal.com; philip_matthews@magma.ca;
> dwing@cisco.com; spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com; mls.ietf@gmail.com;
> dwing@cisco.com; Dave Thaler
> Cc: spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com; behave@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-
> editor.org
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 (3737)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5389, "Session
> Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5389&eid=3737
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 17
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The IAB has mandated that protocols developed for this purposedocument a
> specific set of considerations.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The IAB has suggested that protocols developed for this purposedocument a
> specific set of considerations.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The IAB UNSAF RFC (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3424) is Informational, and
> the IAB hasn't "mandated" what IETF protocol documents contain for
> something like 20 years, if I understand correctly.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply
> All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is
> reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit
> the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5389 (draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)
> Publication Date    : October 2008
> Author(s)           : J. Rosenberg, R. Mahy, P. Matthews, D. Wing
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 (373… RFC Errata System
Re: [BEHAVE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5389 … Dave Thaler
[BEHAVE] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC538… RFC Errata System
Re: [BEHAVE] [Errata Held for Document Update] RF… Dave Thaler