Re: [Ietf-behave] New attendee
Saikat Guha <sg266@cornell.edu> Tue, 26 July 2005 09:21 UTC
From: Saikat Guha <sg266@cornell.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:21:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [Ietf-behave] New attendee
In-Reply-To: <20050722200316.9829.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <1122369669.5745.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Boundary..27398.1163630134.multipart/signed"
Hi Karlheinz, Glad to have you onboard. Below is a collection of links to get you started. The UDP NAT standards draft is nearing consensus (hot on the mailing list), a bunch of TCP drafts and measurement studies are available and work on multicast standardization has just recently been started. I believe, some ICMP behavior has been moved out of UDP draft and is search for a new home. On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 11:34 -0700, Karlheinz Wurm wrote: > a quick > briefing in what work are already done and what research still have to > be done. Mail archives: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/ietf-behave/ and a really old status update: o http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/ietf-behave/msg00311.html UDP: - WG draft: draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp-03.txt - Some research/measurements: o draft-jennings-behave-test-results-01.txt o http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat/ TCP: - Proposed WG drafts: o draft-sivakumar-behave-nat-tcp-req-01.txt o draft-hoffman-behave-tcp-02.txt o draft-modadugu-nat-tcp-00.txt - Some research/measurements: o http://www.guha.cc/~saikat/stunt-results.php (http://nutss.gforge.cis.cornell.edu/pub/draft-imc-stunt.pdf) o http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat/ Multicast, SCTP, Gen etc drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi? command=search_list&sub_state_id=6&search_filename=behave&search_button=SEARCH IETF 62 Minutes and presentations: o http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu/behave/behave62/ o https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/proceeding_interim.cgi? meeting_num=62 ... look for BEHAVE cheers, -- Saikat Attachment: signature.asc
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- [Ietf-behave] Applicability statement in the UDP … Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- Use of standard terminology (WAS:: RE: [Ietf-beha… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- STUNT test results (was RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Map… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: STUNT test results (was RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- [Ietf-behave] New attendee Karlheinz Wurm
- Re: [Ietf-behave] New attendee Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Bryan Ford
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Bryan Ford
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Bryan Ford
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Remi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Saikat Guha
- Re: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Francois Audet
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Senthil Sivakumar (ssenthil)
- RE: [Ietf-behave] NAT Mapping refresh vs NAT filt… Cullen Jennings