Re: [BEHAVE] NAT Logging -- Port violation event for MAP-E or LW4over6 BR

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

Well, this comment has triggered an interesting discussion in Softwires, 
but now that I'm putting the final touches to a reissue of the SYSLOG 
NAT logging draft, I see it doesn't fit in very neatly there. The border 
router in these cases is not a NAT, so any discussion of logging 
probably belongs in a MAP-specific document. The CE is also responsible 
for checking, and the CE is a NAT, so it fits with the CE, but I'm not 
sure if it's worth standardizing.

I'll leave it out unless I get comments otherwise.

On 25/04/2013 7:35 AM, Tom Taylor wrote:
> The MAP-E and LW4over6 border routers are responsible for checking that
> the ports assigned by the CE are within the set allocated to that CE. I
> think we need a NAT logging event to report detection of an out-of-range
> port.
>
> Tom Taylor