Re: [BEHAVE] v4v6 coexistence reading list for IETF73

Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr> Thu, 13 November 2008 08:41 UTC

Message-ID: <491BE7A7.8080609@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:39:03 +0100
From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
References: <491B6052.30200@sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <491B6052.30200@sri.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>, softwires@ietf.org, int-area-request@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] v4v6 coexistence reading list for IETF73
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0680308009=="
Sender: behave-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: behave-bounces@ietf.org

Ed Jankiewicz (1-12/1-31/200x) 11/13/08 12:01 AM:

more for my own purposes reading through the alternative drafts, however this may be of use to those interested in current work in IPv4-IPv6 coexistence tools. The work is going on in 3 working groups and some drafts will be on on each agenda (some I am guessing will be) are in bold. There will also be some general discussion in the intarea meeting. The drafts in italic may be obsolete, either merged into other work or dropped. And don't forget the paper presented by Randy Bush on Address Plus Port https://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=560" rel="nofollow"><https://mice.cs.columbia.edu/getTechreport.php?techreportID=560> that may become a draft.

I did not include some related work on tunneling, that maybe should be.
Please comment if I have missed any drafts, or mis-characterized any of these as to WG, status or category. Or any other suggestions to make it more useful.

Thanks for the list, and the opportunity to update it.

1) Draft-despres-sam-scenarios is now obsolete

2) The right document on SAM is draft-despres-sam-01
- Its sections on Problem Statement and SAM Specification are IMO very relevant.
- Its section on Application Examples is unfortunately still seriously bugged (rather than going through the details, waiting for the slides under preparation is advisable).

o Port-range and privacy-protection aspects or the draft are planned for presentation in Behave
o Address-mapping and encapsulation aspects are expected to be planned for presentation in Softwire.

Regards,
RD

v6ops WG



Behave WG



Softwires WG



Other or unspecified WG

Framework, scenarios, comparison





*Draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework*





Draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence



Draft-wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison



Draft-despres-sam-scenarios

Problem Statements, requirements



*Draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req*



Draft-miyata-behave-prefix64







Draft-jennings-behave-nat6











Solutions



/Draft-despres-v6ops-apbp/



*draft-baker-behave-v4v6-translation*



*Draft-durand-softwire-dual-stack-lite*



Draft-despres-sam



*draft-bagnulo-behave-dns64*







*draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64*







Draft-baker-behave-ivi
/Draft-xli-behave-ivi/







*draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity*





“helpers”





*Draft-denis-behave-v4v6exthdr*





Ed Jankiewicz - SRI International
Fort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch
732-389-1003 or ed.jankiewicz@sri.com
_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
Behave@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
  

_______________________________________________
Behave mailing list
Behave@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave

[BEHAVE] v4v6 coexistence reading list for IETF73 Ed Jankiewicz
Re: [BEHAVE] v4v6 coexistence reading list for IE… Eric Klein
Re: [BEHAVE] v4v6 coexistence reading list for IE… Rémi Després