Re: [Ietf-behave] slashdot: p2p firewalled file transfers

[[e-mail]]

I think most residential routers do not understand DCCP and discard it
because DCCP is another transport layer protocol with another 'protocol
number'.

Besides getting p2p-TCP to work through NATs, we might want to look into
RUDP that IETF once explored in the past, and that implements
congestion&flow control like TCP.

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99mar/I-D/draft-ietf-sigtran-reliable-udp-00.txt
which was derived from RDP:
- rfc 980 (version 1)
- rfc 1151 (version 2),

Yutaka


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Melinda Shore" <mshore@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dan Wing" <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Ietf-behave] slashdot: p2p firewalled file transfers


> On Wednesday, November 24, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
> > Will DCCP survive over my Linksys WRT54G?
>
> Sure. although if you use it to transport application data
> that includes payload-embedded addresses the usual caveats
> apply.
>
> Melinda
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-behave mailing list
> Ietf-behave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-behave
>
>
>